article Open AccessTop 1% cited
Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods
BMC Health Services Research · 2018 · Vol. 18(1) · pp. 177–177
Jodi Summers Holtrop✉(University of Colorado Denver)Borsika A. Rabin(University of California, San Diego)Russell E. Glasgow(University of Colorado Denver)
Abstract
In summary, qualitative and mixed methods approaches to RE-AIM help understand complex situations and results, why and how outcomes were obtained, and contextual factors not easily assessed using quantitative measures.
Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeQualitative researchSummative assessmentFormative assessmentManagement scienceNursing researchHealth informaticsComputer scienceMultimethodologyMedicineData science
MeSH terms
Health PromotionHealth Services ResearchHumansModels, OrganizationalQualitative Research
Funding
- National Institutes of Health
Citations
380
FWCI
42.68
field-weighted impact
References
57
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction
Psychiatry Research · 2019 · 1,222 citations
References
Bridging Research and Practice
American Journal of Preventive Medicine · 2012 · 1,393 citations
The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time
American Journal of Public Health · 2013 · 1,066 citations
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
American Journal of Public Health · 1999 · 7,070 citations
The critical incident technique.
Psychological Bulletin · 1954 · 7,607 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.