Scinovex

Research article · 2016 · Full text

International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry

Liquid chromatographic screening of packaged meat products for enrofloxacin residue

Rajkishor GogoiDC RoyLahon LcSK Laskar

Volume 1(1) · Pages 08–09

Research areasPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

The present study was undertaken to monitor packaged meat products for Enrofloxacin residues using Ultra High Performance liquid Chromatography (UHPLC). A total of 60 samples of packaged chicken sausages, chicken meat balls and chicken nuggets were collected for the study. The samples after collection were preserved at -20 °C. Analyses of the samples were done using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode Array Detection system. Recovery ranged from 85-97%. No residue of enrofloxacin was detected in any of the screened samples. The samples were safe for consumption as per public health point of view.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Enrofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent commonly used in veterinary medicine. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Enrofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent commonly used in veterinary medicine.

      In the paper's own words

      “Enrofloxacin is a broad spectrum antimicrobial agent which is widely used in veterinary medicine”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The indiscriminate use of enrofloxacin poses a risk because residues can remain in meat products intended for human consumption. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The indiscriminate use of enrofloxacin poses a risk because residues can remain in meat products intended for human consumption.

      In the paper's own words

      “The indiscriminate use of this agent possesses a considerable risk due to the presence of residues in meat and meat products meant for human consumption.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • To manage safety, the FAO/WHO have established Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) for enrofloxacin in animal tissues. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      To manage safety, the FAO/WHO have established Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) for enrofloxacin in animal tissues.

      In the paper's own words

      “The FAO/WHO have recommended Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) for Enrofloxacin in animal tissues”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The study aimed to monitor packaged meat products from local shops in Guwahati city for enrofloxacin residues using Ultra High Performance liquid Chromatography (UHPLC). View evidence ↗

      The question

      The study aimed to monitor packaged meat products from local shops in Guwahati city for enrofloxacin residues using Ultra High Performance liquid Chromatography (UHPLC).

      In the paper's own words

      “the present study was undertaken to monitor packaged meat products for Enrofloxacin residues available in local shops of Guwahati city using Ultra High Performance liquid Chromatography (UHPLC).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The analysis for enrofloxacin residues was conducted using a UHPLC system equipped with a diode array detector. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The analysis for enrofloxacin residues was conducted using a UHPLC system equipped with a diode array detector.

      In the paper's own words

      “Screening and analysis of samples for the presence of Enrofloxacin residues was performed with Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) system with diode array detector.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials And Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The method used an isocratic mobile phase of water, acetonitrile, and tetraethylamine (83:14:0.45 v/v) with UV detection at 277 nm. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The method used an isocratic mobile phase of water, acetonitrile, and tetraethylamine (83:14:0.45 v/v) with UV detection at 277 nm.

      In the paper's own words

      “The mobile phase consisted of mixture of water, acetonitrile and tetraethylamine (83:14:0.45 v/v). Enrofloxacin was eluted under isocratic conditions. The excitation/emission wavelengths used for the UV detection was 277 nm for Enrofloxacin.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials And Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Sample preparation included solid phase extraction using a C18 polymeric cartridge and final filtration through a 0.22µm nylon filter. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Sample preparation included solid phase extraction using a C18 polymeric cartridge and final filtration through a 0.22µm nylon filter.

      In the paper's own words

      “The filtrate was passed through solid phase extraction procedure using a C18 polymeric cartridge after which it was Further filtered using 0.22µm nylon filter paper.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Materials And Methods

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The enrofloxacin standard produced a linear calibration curve with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.999. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The enrofloxacin standard produced a linear calibration curve with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.999.

      In the paper's own words

      “linear calibration curve of Enrofloxacin standard having correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.999 was obtained.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results And Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Analyte separation was completed in under 5 minutes. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Analyte separation was completed in under 5 minutes.

      In the paper's own words

      “The separation of the analytes was achieved in less than 5 mins.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results And Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The recovery rate of enrofloxacin in spiked samples was between 85% and 97%. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The recovery rate of enrofloxacin in spiked samples was between 85% and 97%.

      In the paper's own words

      “Recovery of enrofloxacin in spiked samples ranged from 85-97%.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results And Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • No enrofloxacin residues were detected in any of the screened chicken sausage, meat ball, or nugget samples. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      No enrofloxacin residues were detected in any of the screened chicken sausage, meat ball, or nugget samples.

      In the paper's own words

      “After screening all the samples of chicken sausage, chicken meat balls and chicken nuggets, residue of enrofloxacin was not detected in any of the samples.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results And Discussion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors concluded that the tested chicken sausages, meat balls, and nuggets are safe and free from enrofloxacin residue. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors concluded that the tested chicken sausages, meat balls, and nuggets are safe and free from enrofloxacin residue.

      In the paper's own words

      “the samples of chicken sausages, chicken meat balls and chicken nuggets may be considered as safe and free from enrofloxacin residue”

      Page 2

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The authors state that there is a continuing need to monitor these products periodically. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors state that there is a continuing need to monitor these products periodically.

      In the paper's own words

      “all though there is every need of monitoring these products from time to time.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Conclusion

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (packaged chicken sausages, meatballs, and nuggets). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Study Workflow
AI-generated conceptual illustration (packaged chicken sausages, meatballs, and nuggets). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (packaged chicken sausages, meatballs, and nuggets). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Study Workflow

AI-generated conceptual illustration (packaged chicken sausages, meatballs, and nuggets). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Enrofloxacin is a broad spectrum antimicrobial agent which is widely used in veterinary medicine (Nouws et al. 1988) [4]. Enrofloxacin residues are reported in animal tissues (Schneider, 2001; Cornejo et al., 2011) [5, 2]. The indiscriminate use of this agent possesses a considerable risk due to the presence of residues in meat and meat products meant for human consumption. The FAO/WHO have recommended Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) for Enrofloxacin in animal tissues (FAO/WHO, 2002) [3].

Packaged meat products like sausages, meat balls and nuggets are considered as important food item and has become popular in recent times. There may be every chance of presence of drug residues in such products. Thus the present study was undertaken to monitor packaged meat products for Enrofloxacin residues available in local shops of Guwahati city using Ultra High Performance liquid Chromatography (UHPLC).

Materials And Methods

A total of 60 samples (twenty each) of chicken sausage, chicken meat balls and chicken nuggets were collected from local shops of Guwahati city. The samples were then stored at - 20ºC till the time of processing. Screening and analysis of samples for the presence of Enrofloxacin residues was performed with Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) system with diode array detector. The mobile phase consisted of mixture of water, acetonitrile and tetraethylamine (83:14:0.45 v/v).

Enrofloxacin was eluted under isocratic conditions. The excitation/emission wavelengths used for the UV detection was 277 nm for Enrofloxacin. Enrofloxacin standard (Sigma), HPLC grade acetonitrile, HPLC grade water and other chemicals and solvents of analytical grade were used for the study. About 10 g of the sample with equal volume of distilled water was taken in a tissue blender and mixed.

Ten grams of each blended sample was transferred in a beaker. After few minutes 10 ml of acetonitrile was added and left undisturbed for 10 min. The sample was then sonicated with the help of Ultrasonicator. The samples were then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 0 ˚C and the collected supernatant was filtered using Whatman Filter paper.

The filtrate was passed through solid phase extraction procedure using a C18 polymeric cartridge after which it was Further filtered using 0.22µm nylon filter paper. VET 2016; 1(1): 08-09 Gogoi R Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, C.V.Sc, AAU, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India Roy DC Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, C.V.Sc, AAU, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India Lahon LC Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, C.V.Sc, AAU, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India Laskar SK Department of LPT, C.V.Sc, AAU, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India Correspondence: Gogoi R Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, C.V.Sc, AAU, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India

Results And Discussion

In the present study, linear calibration curve of Enrofloxacin standard having correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.999 was obtained. This was similar to that reported by Cinquina et al., 2003 [1]. The separation of the analytes was achieved in less than 5 mins. Acetonitrile was effective in the deproteinization of the samples and in the isolation of analytes from spiked samples.

This method allows the determination of residues of Enrofloxacin in different matrices with higher sensitivity. Recovery of enrofloxacin in spiked samples ranged from 85- 97%. This finding was in similar line as that reported by Cinquina (loc cit.) where average recovery was 88%. After screening all the samples of chicken sausage, chicken meat balls and chicken nuggets, residue of enrofloxacin was not detected in any of the samples.

This may be due to absence of the drug in the meat products.

Conclusion

It can be concluded from the present study that the samples of chicken sausages, chicken meat balls and chicken nuggets may be considered as safe and free from enrofloxacin residue, all though there is every need of monitoring these products from time to time.

References

5 in the original paper
  1. Cinquina AL, Roberti P, Giannetti L, Longo F, Draisci, R, Fagiolo A et al. Journal of Chromatography A. 2003; 987(1):221-226.
  2. Cornejo J, Lapierre L, Iragüen D, Cornejo S, Cassus G, Richter P, et al. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2011; 4:1365-2885.
  3. FAO/WHO. Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. Fifty-eight meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert commmitte on food additives, WHO Technical Report Series, 2002, 911.
  4. Nouws JFM, Mevius DJ, Vree TB, Baars AM. Laurensen Veteinary Quaterly 1988; 10:156-163.
  5. Schneider MJ. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2001; 39:351-356