Scinovex

Research article · 2016 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

On Pgprw-closed maps and pgprw-open maps in topological spaces

R. S. WaliVivekananda Dembre

Volume 1(1) · Pages 17–21

Research areasFuzzy and Soft Set TheoryAdvanced Algebra and Logic

↓ Read full-text PDF2 citations

Abstract

Author-written

In this paper, we introduce pgprw-closed map from a topological space X to a topological space Y as the image of every closed set is pgprw-closed and also we prove that the composition of two pgprw-closed maps need not be pgprw-closed map. We also obtain some properties of pgprw-closed maps.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • The study of generalized closed mappings in topological spaces has been established by previous researchers such as Malghan and Arockiaran. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The study of generalized closed mappings in topological spaces has been established by previous researchers such as Malghan and Arockiaran.

      In the paper's own words

      “Generalized closed mappings were introduce and studied by Malghan [12]. Rg-closed maps by Arockiaran [13].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Pre generalized pre regular weakly closed (pgprw-closed) sets were previously introduced as a class of sets situated between p-closed and gpr-closed sets. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Pre generalized pre regular weakly closed (pgprw-closed) sets were previously introduced as a class of sets situated between p-closed and gpr-closed sets.

      In the paper's own words

      “Wali and Vivekananda Dembre [14] introduced new class of sets called pre generalized pre regular weakly - closed (briefly pgprw - closed) sets in topological spaces which lies between the class of all p - closed sets and the class of all gpr - closed sets”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The authors aim to introduce and study a new class of maps called pgprw-closed maps and determine their relationship with other generalized closed maps. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The authors aim to introduce and study a new class of maps called pgprw-closed maps and determine their relationship with other generalized closed maps.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper, a new class of maps called pre generalized pre regular weakly closed maps (briefly, pgprw-closed) maps have been introduced and studied their relations with various generalized closed maps.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The research is conducted using general topological spaces (X, τ) and (Y, σ) without assuming specific separation axioms unless noted. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The research is conducted using general topological spaces (X, τ) and (Y, σ) without assuming specific separation axioms unless noted.

      In the paper's own words

      “Throughout this paper space (X, τ) and (Y, σ) (or simply X and Y) always denote topological space on which no separation axioms are assumed unless explicitly stated.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The authors define a pgprw-closed map as one where the image of every closed set in the domain is a pgprw-closed set in the codomain. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors define a pgprw-closed map as one where the image of every closed set in the domain is a pgprw-closed set in the codomain.

      In the paper's own words

      “A map f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) is said to be Pre generalized pre regular weakly closed map (briefly pgprw-closed) if the image of every closed set (X, τ) is pgprw-closed in (Y, σ).”

      Page 2

      Found in: Definition

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The authors define a pgprw-open map as one where the image of every open set in the domain is a pgprw-open set in the codomain. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors define a pgprw-open map as one where the image of every open set in the domain is a pgprw-open set in the codomain.

      In the paper's own words

      “A map f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) is called a pgprw-open map if the image f (A) is pgprw-open in (Y, σ) for each open set A in (X, τ)”

      Page 3

      Found in: Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  4. What they found

    • All closed maps are pgprw-closed maps, but not all pgprw-closed maps are closed maps. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      All closed maps are pgprw-closed maps, but not all pgprw-closed maps are closed maps.

      In the paper's own words

      “Every closed map is pgprw-closed map but not conversely.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • All p-closed maps are pgprw-closed maps, though the reverse is not necessarily true. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      All p-closed maps are pgprw-closed maps, though the reverse is not necessarily true.

      In the paper's own words

      “Every p-closed map is pgprw-closed map but not conversely.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • A pgprw-closed map is also a gp, gpr, and gspr closed map, but these types of maps are not necessarily pgprw-closed. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      A pgprw-closed map is also a gp, gpr, and gspr closed map, but these types of maps are not necessarily pgprw-closed.

      In the paper's own words

      “If f is pgprw closed map then f is gp, gpr, gspr closed map but not conversely.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Pgprw-closed maps are independent of both β-closed maps and semi-closed maps. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Pgprw-closed maps are independent of both β-closed maps and semi-closed maps.

      In the paper's own words

      “the β-closed maps and pgprw closed maps are independent and similarly semi-closed maps and pgprw-closed maps.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Remark:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The composition of two pgprw-closed maps is not guaranteed to be a pgprw-closed map. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The composition of two pgprw-closed maps is not guaranteed to be a pgprw-closed map.

      In the paper's own words

      “The composition of two pgprw-closed maps need not be pgprw-closed map in general”

      Page 3

      Found in: Remark:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • If the first map in a composition is closed and the second is pgprw-closed, the resulting composition is a pgprw-closed map. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      If the first map in a composition is closed and the second is pgprw-closed, the resulting composition is a pgprw-closed map.

      In the paper's own words

      “If f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) is closed map and g: (Y, σ) (Z, ) is pgprw-closed map, then the g of: ( X, τ ) (Z, ) composition is pgprw-closed map.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Remark:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The composition of two pgprw-closed maps is pgprw-closed if the intermediate space (Y, σ) is one where every pgprw-closed subset is closed. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The composition of two pgprw-closed maps is pgprw-closed if the intermediate space (Y, σ) is one where every pgprw-closed subset is closed.

      In the paper's own words

      “Let (X, τ) and (Z, ) be topological spaces and (Y, σ) be topological spac where every pgprw-closed subset is closed. Then the composition g of:(X, τ) (Z, ) of the pgprw-closed maps f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) and g: ( Y, σ) (Z, ) is pgprw-closed map.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Remark:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • For a bijective map, being a pgprw-open map, a pgprw-closed map, and having a pgprw-continuous inverse are all equivalent properties. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      For a bijective map, being a pgprw-open map, a pgprw-closed map, and having a pgprw-continuous inverse are all equivalent properties.

      In the paper's own words

      “For any bijection map f: (X, τ) (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent. 1. f -1: (Y, σ) (X, τ) is pgprw-continuous map. 2. f is pgprw-open map and 3. f is pgprw-closed map.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that they have successfully introduced and investigated pgprw-closed and pgprw-open maps, noting specifically that the composition of two pgprw-closed maps is not always pgprw-closed. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that they have successfully introduced and investigated pgprw-closed and pgprw-open maps, noting specifically that the composition of two pgprw-closed maps is not always pgprw-closed.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper, a new class of maps called pgprw-closed maps and pgprw-open maps in topological spaces are introduced and investigated and we observed that the composition of two pgprw-closed maps need not be pgprw-closed maps.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • The authors state that future work will involve analyzing the same process for pgprw-properties. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors state that future work will involve analyzing the same process for pgprw-properties.

      In the paper's own words

      “In future the same process will be analyzed for pgprw-properties.”

      Page 4

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract topological spaces represented as geometric manifolds). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Study overview
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract topological spaces represented as geometric manifolds). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract topological spaces represented as geometric manifolds). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Study overview

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract topological spaces represented as geometric manifolds). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Generalized closed mappings were introduce and studied by Malghan [12] . Rg-closed maps by Arockiaran [13] . In this paper, a new class of maps called pre generalized pre regular weakly closed maps (briefly, pgprw-closed) maps have been introduced and studied their relations with various generalized closed maps. We prove that the composition of two pgprw -closed maps need not be pgprw-closed map. We also obtain some properties of pgprw-closed maps. Wali and Vivekananda Dembre [14] introduced new class of sets called pre generalized pre regular weakly -closed (briefly pgprw -closed) sets in topological spaces which lies between the class of all p -closed sets and the class of all gpr -closed sets

Preliminaries

Throughout this paper space (X, τ) and (Y, σ) (or simply X and Y) always denote topological space on which no separation axioms are assumed unless explicitly stated. For a subset A of a space X, Cl(A), Int(A), A c , P-Cl(A) and P-int(A) denote the Closure of A, Interior of A, Compliment of A, pre-closure of A and pre-interior of (A) in X respectively.

Definition:

A subset A of a topological space (X,τ) is called 1. Semi-open set [1] if A  cl(int(A)) and semi-closed set if int(cl(A))  A..

2.

Semi-pre open set [2] (= β-open [1] if Acl(int(cl(A)))and a semi-pre closed set(=β-closed) if int(cl(int(A)))A. 3. Pre-open set [3] if A  int(cl(A)) and pre-closed set if cl(int(A))  A. 4. Generalized pre closed(briefly gp-closed)set [4] ifpcl(A)⊆U wheneverA⊆U and U is open in X. 5. Generalized pre regular closed set(briefly gpr-closed) [5] if pcl(A)U whenever AU and

U is regular open in X. 6. Generalized semi pre regular closed (briefly gspr-closed) set [6] if spcl(A)⊆U whenever A⊆U and U is regular open in X. 7. Pre-generalized-pre-regular closed(briefly pgpr-closed)set [7] if pcl(A)⊆U whenever A⊆ U and U is rg-open in X. 8. W-closed set [8] if cl(A)  U whenever A U and U is semi-open in X. 9. Regular generalized closed set(briefly rg-closed) [9] if cl(A)U whenever AU and U is regular open in X. 10. Generalized closed set(briefly g-closed) [10] if cl(A)  U whenever A  U and U is open in X. 11. Pre generalized pre regular ωeakly closed set [14](briefly pgprω-closed set) if pCl(A)U whenever AU and U is rgα open in (X, τ). 12. pre generalized pre-regular ωeakly open(briefly pgprω-open) [15] set in X if A c is pgprωclosed in X.

On Pgprw-Closed Maps

On Pgprw-Closed Maps

Definition

) is said to be Pre generalized pre regular weakly closed map (briefly pgprw-closed) if the image of every closed set (X, τ) is pgprw-closed in (Y, σ).

Theorem:

Every closed map is pgprw-closed map but not conversely.

Proof:

The proof follows from the definitions and fact that every closed set is pgprw-closed set from Theorem 2.4 [14] .

Remark:

The converse of the above theorem need not be true as seen from the following example.

Example:

Consider X=Y= {a,b,c} with topologies τ = {X, ϕ,{a,c}} and σ = { Y, ϕ, {a}}. Let f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) be the identity map. Then this function is pgprw-closed but not closed as the image of closed set {b} in X is {b} which is not closed set in Y.

Theorem: Every p-closed map is pgprw-closed map but not conversely.

Proof: The proof follows from the definitions and fact that every p-closed set is pgprw-closed set from Theorem 2.4 [14] .

Remark:

The converse of the above theorem need not be true as seen from the following example.

Example:

Consider X=Y={a,b,c,d} with topologies τ = {X, ϕ,{a},{b},{a,b},{a,b,c}} and σ ={Y, ϕ,{a},{b},{a,b},{a,b,c}}. Let map f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) defined by f(a)=c,f(b)=c,f(c)=b,f(d)=d. Then f is pgprw closed map but not closed map and not p-closed map as the image of closed set F={c,d}in X then f(F)={b,d} in Y which is not p-closed set in Y.

Theorem:

If a map f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) is closed then the following holds. If f is pgprw closed map then f is gp, gpr, gspr closed map but not conversely.

Proof:

The proof follows from the defintions and fact that every pgprw closed set is gp, gpr, gspr closed set from Theorem 2.4 [14] .

Remark:

The converse of the above theorem need not be true as seen from the following example.

Example:

Consider X=Y={a,b,c} with topologies τ = {X, ϕ,{a},{b,c}} and σ ={Y, ϕ,{a}.Let map f: X, τ) (Y, σ) defined by f (a)=b, f (b)=a, f (c)=c. Then f is gp, gpr, gspr, closed map but not pgprw closed map as the image of closed set F= {b, c} in X then f (F)={a, c} in Y which is not pgprw-closed set in Y.

Remark:

The following example show that the β-closed maps and pgprw closed maps are independent and similarly semiclosed maps and pgprw-closed maps.

Example:

Consider X=Y={a,b,c} with topologies τ = {X, ϕ,{a}}and σ ={Y, ϕ,{a}}.Let map f: ( X, τ) (Y, σ) defined by f(a)=b,f(b)=a,f(c)=c.. Then f is pgprw closed map but f is not semi closed map, β-closed map as closed set F= {b, c} in X then f(F)={a,c} in Y which is not semi-closed, β-closed set in Y.

Example:

Consider X= {a, b, c},Y={a, b, c, d} with topologies τ = {X, ϕ,{a}}and σ ={Y, ϕ,{a},{b},{a, b},{a, b, c}}.Let map f: (X, τ) (Y, σ )defined by f(a)=d, f(b)=b, f(c)=c.. Then f is semi-closed map, β-closed map, but f is not pgprw closed map as closed set F= {b, c} in X then f (F)={b, c} in Y which is not pgprw-closed set in Y.

Theorem:

A map f: ( X, τ) (Y, σ) is pgprw-closed map if and only if for each subset S of (Y, σ) and each open set U containing f -1 (S)  U, there is a pgprw-open set of (Y, such that S  V and f -1 (V)  U.

Proof: Suppose f is pgprw-closed map. Let S Y and U be an open set of (X, τ) such that f -1 (S)  U. Now X-U is closed set in (X, τ),. Since f is pgprw-closed map, f (X-U) is pgprw closed set in (Y, σ) . Then V=Y-f (X-U) is a pgprw-open set in(Y, σ). Note that f -1 (S)  U implies S V and f -1 (V) = X-f -1 (f(X-U))  X-(X-U) = U. That is f -1 (V)  U. For the converse, let F be a closed set of ( X, τ) Then f -1 (f(F) c )  F c and F c is an open set in ( X, τ) By hypothesis, there exists a pgprw-open set V in (Y, σ) such that f (F) c V and f -1 (V) F c and so F (f -1 (V)) c . Hence V c  f (F)  f(((f -1 (V)) c ) which implies f(V)  V c . Since V c is pgprwclosed in (Y, σ) and therefore f is pgprw-closed map.

Remark:

The composition of two pgprw-closed maps need not be pgprw-closed map in general and this is shown by the following example. (Y, σ) and g: ( X, τ) (Y, σ) be the identity map. Then f and g are pgprw-closed maps but their composition g of: (X, τ) (Z, ) is not pgprw-closed map because F={c} is closed in ( X, τ) but g of({c}) ={c} which is not pgprw-closed in (Z, ). Proof: Let F be any closed set in (X, τ) Since f is closed map, f (F) is closed set in (Y, σ) .Since g is pgprw-closed map, g (f (F)) is pgprw-closed set in (Z, ). That is g of (F) = g(f(F)) is pgprw-closed and hence g of is pgprw-closed map. (Y, σ) and g:(Y, σ) (Z, )be the identity map. Then f is pgprw closed map and g is a closed map but their composition g of: (X, , τ) (Z, ) is not pgprw-closed map since for the closed set {c}in (X, τ) but g of({c})= {c} which is not pgprw-closed in (Z, ) 3.20 Theorem: Let (X, τ) and (Z, ) be topological spaces and (Y, σ) be topological spac where every pgprw-closed subset is closed. Then the composition g of:(X, τ) (Z, ) of the pgprw-closed maps f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) and g: ( Y, σ) (Z, ) is pgprwclosed map.

3.17

Proof: Let A be a closed set of (X, τ). Since f is pgprw-closed map, f (A) is pgprw-closed map in. Then by hypothesis f (A) is closed. Since g is pgprw-closed map, g (f (A)) is pgprw closed map in (Z, ) and g (f (A)) = g of (A). Therefore g of is pgprwclosed map. Proof: Let A be a closed set of (X, τ) Since f is g-closed map,f (A) is g-closed in (Y, σ),. Since g is pgprw-closed map,g (f (A)) is pgprw-closed in (Z, ) and g (f (A)) = g of (A).Therefore g of is pgprw-closed map.

pgprw-open maps

pgprw-open maps

References

22 in the original paper
  1. Levine N. Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces. 1963; 70:36-41.
  2. Andrijevic D. Semi-preopen sets, Mat. Vesnik. 1986; 38(1):24-32.
  3. Mashhour AS, Abd El-Monsef ME. El-Deeb SN.On pre-continuous and weak Precontinuous mappings, Proc. Math. Phys. Soc. Egypt. 1982; 53:47-53.
  4. Maki H, Umehara J, Noiri T. Every Topological space is pre T½ mem Fac sci,Kochi univ, Math. 1996; 17:33-42.
  5. Gnanambal Y. studies on generalized pre-regular closed sets and generalization of locally closed Sets, ph.d thesis bharathiar university,coimbatore. 1998.
  6. Govindappa Navalagi, Chandrashakarappa A.S. & S.V.Gurushantanavar, Int. Jour of Mathematics and Computer Applications. 2010; 2(1-2):51-58.
  7. Anitha M, Thangavely P. On pre generalized pre regular closed sets(pgpr) Acta ciencia Indian. 2005; 31M(4):1035-1040.
  8. sheik john M, A study on generalization of closed sets on continuous maps in topological & bitopological spaces, ph.d thesis, bharathiar university,coimbatore. 2002.
  9. Palaniappan N, Rao KC. Regular generalized closed Sets, Kyungpook, Math. J. 1993; 33(2):211-219.
  10. Levine N. Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend.Circ Mat. Palermo. 1970; 19(2):89-96.
  11. Wali RS. on some topics in general and fuzzy topological spaces;ph.d thesis Karnatak university thesis. 2007.
  12. Malgan SR. Generalized closed maps. J karnatak university sci. 1982;27:82-88.
  13. Arockiarani I. studies on generalization of generalized closed sets and maps in topological spaces; ph.d thesis, Bharathiar university,coimbatore. 1997.
  14. Wali RS, Vivekananda Dembre. On Pre Generalızed Pre Regular Weakly Closed Sets in Topologıcal Spaces. Journal of Computer and Mathematical Sciences. 2015; 6(2):113-125.
  15. Wali RS, Vivekananda Dembre. On Pre Generalized Pre Regular Weakly Open Sets and Pre Generalized Pre Regular Weakly Neighbourhoods in Topological Spaces Annals of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2015; 10(1). Published on 12 April 2015
  16. Wali RS, Vivekananda Dembre. On Pre Generalized Pre Regular Weakly irresolute and pgprw-Continuous functions in Topological Spaces; Asian journal of current Engineering and Maths (accepted). 2016.
  17. Crosseley SG, Hilderbrand SK. semi-topological properties,fund math. 1972; 74:233-254.
  18. Wali RS, Vivekananda Dembre. on pgprw-continuous functions in topological spaces. Bulletin of mathematics and statistics research. 2016; 4(1).
  19. El-deeb N, Hasanein IA,Noiri T, Mashhour AS. on pre regular spaces, bull. math, soc. sci. math R.S.Roumanie. 1983; 27:311-319.
  20. Noiri TA, Maki H, Umehara J. gp functions, mem, fac. sci. kochi univ. math. 1998; 20:13-28.
  21. Noiri TA. a-generalization-of-closed-mappings, atti, acad. naz.lincei rend. cl. scifis. mat. natur. 1973; 54:412-415.
  22. Govindappa Navalagi, Chandrashakarappa A.S. & S.V.Gurushantanavar, Int. Jour of Mathematical sciences. 2012; 2(1):231237. gspr functions in topological spaces.

Cited by 2

From OpenAlex, OpenCitations and reference lists read by Scinovex

  • New Axioms in Topological Spaces ↗

    Vivekananda Dembre · International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research · 2018

    In this paper, we study some separation axioms namely, w-To-space, w-T1 -space and w-T2-space and their properties.We also obtain some of their characterizations.

    ❝ 3PDF
  • New semi generalized spaces in topological spaces ↗

    Vivekananda Dembre, Pravin G Dhawale, Devendra Gowda · International journal of applied research · 2018

    ❝ 1Found by Scinovex