Scinovex

Research article · 2017 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

Conjugacy class sizes of some real elements and solvability of finite groups

Qingjun KongZaiqiu Han

Volume 2(1) · Pages 64–65

Research areasFinite Group Theory ResearchCoding theory and cryptographygraph theory and CDMA systems

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

Let G be a finite group. We mainly investigate how certain arithmetical conditions on conjugacy class sizes of all real elements of prime power orders of G influence the solvability of G. Some known results are generalized.Mathematics Subject Classification: 20D15, 20E45

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • There is a recognized strong relationship between the structure of a finite group and the sizes of its conjugacy classes, which is often used to study group solvability. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      There is a recognized strong relationship between the structure of a finite group and the sizes of its conjugacy classes, which is often used to study group solvability.

      In the paper's own words

      “It is well known that there is a strong relation between the structure of a group and the sizes of its conjugacy classes and there exist several results studying the solvability of a group under some arithmetical conditions on its conjugacy class sizes”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Previous research has established that a finite group is solvable if the number 4 does not divide any of its conjugacy class sizes. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Previous research has established that a finite group is solvable if the number 4 does not divide any of its conjugacy class sizes.

      In the paper's own words

      “a classical result of Chillag and Herzog [2] show that G is solvable if 4 does not divide any conjugacy class sizes of a finite group G.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • It has been previously proven that a group is solvable if elements with prime power order also possess a prime power index. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      It has been previously proven that a group is solvable if elements with prime power order also possess a prime power index.

      In the paper's own words

      “Baer in [1] proves that a group G is solvable if its elements of prime power order have also prime power index.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • Existing literature indicates that groups where all real conjugacy classes have prime power size are solvable. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Existing literature indicates that groups where all real conjugacy classes have prime power size are solvable.

      In the paper's own words

      “in [4] the authors prove that every group whose real classes all have prime power size is solvable”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The authors aim to determine how specific arithmetical conditions on the conjugacy class sizes of real elements with prime power orders affect the solvability of a finite group. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The authors aim to determine how specific arithmetical conditions on the conjugacy class sizes of real elements with prime power orders affect the solvability of a finite group.

      In the paper's own words

      “we will continue to investigate the influences of conjugacy class sizes of finite groups on the solvability of finite groups. We show how imposing some arithmetical conditions on conjugacy class sizes of some real elements of prime power orders of G yields restrictions on the solvability of G.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The authors use a proof by induction on the order of the group |G| to establish their main theorem. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors use a proof by induction on the order of the group |G| to establish their main theorem.

      In the paper's own words

      “Proof of Theorem A: We argue by induction on |G|.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The proof strategy involves analyzing a maximal normal subgroup N of the group G. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The proof strategy involves analyzing a maximal normal subgroup N of the group G.

      In the paper's own words

      “Let N be a maximal normal subgroup of G.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The authors utilize a lemma stating that for an odd prime p, a p-power order real element in the quotient group G/N corresponds to a p-power order real element in G. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors utilize a lemma stating that for an odd prime p, a p-power order real element in the quotient group G/N corresponds to a p-power order real element in G.

      In the paper's own words

      “Lemma 2.1 ([7, Lemma 6]) Let N be a normal subgroup of a group G and let p be an odd prime. If Nx is a p-power order real element in G/N, then Nx=Ny for some p-power order real element y in G.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The main finding is that a finite group G is solvable if every real element of prime power order in G also has a prime power index. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The main finding is that a finite group G is solvable if every real element of prime power order in G also has a prime power index.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem A. If all real elements of prime power order in G have also prime power index, then G is solvable.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that imposing arithmetical conditions on the conjugacy class sizes of real elements of prime power order provides a valid method for restricting and determining the solvability of finite groups. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that imposing arithmetical conditions on the conjugacy class sizes of real elements of prime power order provides a valid method for restricting and determining the solvability of finite groups.

      In the paper's own words

      “We show how imposing some arithmetical conditions on conjugacy class sizes of some real elements of prime power orders of G yields restrictions on the solvability of G.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Results

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical group structure represented by geometric polyhedra). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Conceptual Logic of Theorem A
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical group structure represented by geometric polyhedra). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical group structure represented by geometric polyhedra). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Conceptual Logic of Theorem A

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract mathematical group structure represented by geometric polyhedra). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

Throughout the following, G always denotes a finite group. For an element x of G, we denote by G x the conjugacy class of G in which x lies, | G x | the size of G x (following Baer [1], we call ) (x IndG =| G x |=|G:C_{G}(x)|, the index of x in G). The rest of our notation and terminology are standard. The reader may refer to ref [6].

It is well known that there is a strong relation between the structure of a group and the sizes of its conjugacy classes and there exist several results studying the solvability of a group under some arithmetical conditions on its conjugacy class sizes (for example, see) [1-2, 4-5]. Among these results, a classical result of Chillag and Herzog [2] show that G is solvable if 4 does not divide any conjugacy class sizes of a finite group G. On the other hand, some other authors replace conditions for all conjugacy classes by conditions referring to only some conjugacy classes to investigate the solvability of a finite group. For instance, Baer in [1] proves that a group G is solvable if its elements of prime power order have also prime power index.

In [5], Shirong Li proves that G is solvable if 4 does not divide any conjugacy class sizes of elements of prime power order of a finite group G. Recall that a conjugacy class G g of G is called real if G g = G g ) ( 1  , and the terminology is due to the following fact: these are precisely the conjugacy classes where every character of G takes a real value. It has been shown that even this relatively small set has a remarkable connection with the structure of the group. For instance, in [4] the authors prove that every group whose real classes all have prime power size is solvable the corollary of Theory 3.1 in [4].

Stimulated by the above

Results

, in this paper, we will continue to investigate the influences of conjugacy class sizes of finite groups on the solvability of finite groups. We show how imposing some arithmetical conditions on conjugacy class sizes of some real elements of prime power orders of G yields restrictions on the solvability of G. Our main result is the following: Theorem A. If all real elements of prime power order in G have also prime power index, then G is solvable. 2.

Preliminaries In this section, we give some lemmas which are useful for our main results. Maths 2017; 2(1): 64-65 Qingjun Kong Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, People's Republic of China Zaiqiu Han Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, People's Republic of China Correspondence Qingjun Kong Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, People's Republic of China Lemma 2.1 ([7, Lemma 6]) Let N be a normal subgroup of a group G and let p be an odd prime. If Nx is a p-power order real element in G/N, then Nx=Ny for some p-power order real element y in G. Lemma 2.2 ([4, Lemma 2.4]) Let G be a group. (i) If x is a real element of G and | G x | is odd, then 2x =1. (ii) If x is a real element of G, then every power of x is a real element of G. (iii) The identity is the unique real element of G if and only if |G| is odd. (iv) If NG and |G/N| is odd, then Re (G)=Re(N).

Lemma 2.3 ([2, Theorem 1.1]) Let NG, xN and yG.Then 4. Dolfi S, Pacifici E, Sanus L. Finite groups with real conjugacy classes of prime size. Israel J Math. 2010; 175:179-189. 5.

Shirong Li. Finite groups with exactly two class lengths of elements of prime power order, Arch. Math. 1996; 67:100-105. 6. Robinson DJS.

A Course in the Theory of Groups. Spring-verlag, New York-Heidelberg- Berlin, 1980. 7. Tong-viet HP. Groups with some arithmetic conditions on real class sizes, Acta Math.

Hungar. 2013; 140:105-116. (i)| N x | | | G x |. (ii)| N G yN / | | G y |. Lemma 2.4 The group G has no nontrivial real elements of odd prime power order if and only if G has a normal Sylow 2-subgroup. Proof. By the proof of Proposition 6.4 in [3], we can easily prove the Lemma. 3.

Proof of the Main Theorem Proof of Theorem A: We argue by induction on |G|. Let N be a maximal normal subgroup of G. Recalling that every real element x of prime power order of N is a real element of G, and that | N x | divides | G x | by Lemma 2.3, we get that, for every x Re (N), | N x | is a prime power. By induction, N is solvable.

Now we assume that G/N is a nonabelian simple group. By Feit-Thompson’s Odd Order Theorem and Lemma 2.4, there exists a nontrivial xNRe (G/N) of odd prime power order. Then, by (i) of Lemma 2.2, | N G xN / | is even. Now, by Lemma 2.1, there exists yRe (G) of prime power order such that yN=xN and, since | N G xN / |=| N G yN / | divides | G y |, it follows that | N G xN / | is a prime power.

This contradicts a classical result by Burnside, and we conclude that G/N must be solvable. The desired

Conclusion

follows. Our proof is complete now.

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by the NNSF of China (11301138).The paper is dedicated to Professor John Cossy for his 75th birthday.

References

3 in the original paper
  1. Baer R. Group elements of prime power index, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1953; 75:20-47.
  2. Chillag D, Herzog M. On the length of the conjugacy classes of finite groups. J Algebra 1990; 131:110-125.
  3. Dolfi S, Navarro G, Tiep P. Primes dividing the degrees of the real characters. Mathematische Zeitschrift 2008; 259:755-774.