Scinovex

Research article · 2017 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

Common fixed point theorems in C* -Algebra-valued b-metric spaces

AnkushVinod Vinod

Volume 2(3) · Pages 10–13

Research areasFixed Point Theorems Analysis

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

By introducing the concept of the contraction of one mapping with respect to another mapping in a C* - algebra-valued b-metric spaces, the paper gives the coincidence and common fixed point of the two mapping in a C* -Algebra-valued b-metric spaces, contracting mapping, coincidence point and common fixed point.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • The Banach contraction principle is a fundamental result in fixed point theory with significant applications in physics and applied mathematics. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The Banach contraction principle is a fundamental result in fixed point theory with significant applications in physics and applied mathematics.

      In the paper's own words

      “Banach contraction principle is a classical and celebrated result of fixed point theory in metric space. Its application is obvious seen in applied mathematics and physics.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • C*-algebra-valued metric spaces generalize standard metric spaces by using positive elements of a unital C*-algebra rather than real numbers. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      C*-algebra-valued metric spaces generalize standard metric spaces by using positive elements of a unital C*-algebra rather than real numbers.

      In the paper's own words

      “Xia [9], the authors introduced the concept of C* - algebra-valued metric spaces. The main idea consists in using the set of all positive elements of a unital C* -algebra instead of the set of real numbers.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The authors introduce C*-algebra-valued b-metric spaces as a generalization of both b-metric spaces and operator-valued metric spaces. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The authors introduce C*-algebra-valued b-metric spaces as a generalization of both b-metric spaces and operator-valued metric spaces.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper, as generalization of b-metric spaces and operator- valued metric spaces [12], we introduce a new type of metric spaces, namely, C* - algebra-valued b-metric spaces”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The research aims to establish fixed point theorems for self-mappings with contractive conditions within the newly introduced C*-algebra-valued b-metric spaces. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The research aims to establish fixed point theorems for self-mappings with contractive conditions within the newly introduced C*-algebra-valued b-metric spaces.

      In the paper's own words

      “we introduce a new type of metric spaces, namely, C* - algebra-valued b-metric spaces, and give some fixed point theorems for self-map with contractive condition on such spaces.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • A C*-algebra-valued b-metric space is defined by a mapping where the distance between points is an element of a C*-algebra, satisfying non-negativity, symmetry, and a modified triangle inequality involving a constant A ≥ I. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      A C*-algebra-valued b-metric space is defined by a mapping where the distance between points is an element of a C*-algebra, satisfying non-negativity, symmetry, and a modified triangle inequality involving a constant A ≥ I.

      In the paper's own words

      “Let X be a nonempty set and 𝐴∈𝔸 such that 𝐴≥𝐼 Suppose the mapping 𝑑: 𝑋× 𝑋→𝔸 satisfies: 1. 0 ≤𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) for all 𝑥, 𝑦∈𝑋 and 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⟺𝑥= 𝑦; 2. 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) for all 𝑥, 𝑦∈𝑋; 3. 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤𝐴[𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦∈𝑋.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Completeness in these spaces is defined by the convergence of every Cauchy sequence, where convergence is determined by the norm of the distance mapping. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      Completeness in these spaces is defined by the convergence of every Cauchy sequence, where convergence is determined by the norm of the distance mapping.

      In the paper's own words

      “If for any 𝜖> 0 ther e is N such that for all n, m >N, ‖𝑑(𝑥𝑛, 𝑥𝑚)‖ ≤𝜖 then {𝑥𝑛} is called a Cauchy sequence with respect to. We say ( X, 𝔸, 𝑑)is a complete C* algebra valued be metric space if every Cauchy sequence with respect to 𝔸 is converge.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • A contractive mapping in this context is defined as a mapping T where the distance between images is bounded by the distance between points transformed by an element B with a norm less than 1. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      A contractive mapping in this context is defined as a mapping T where the distance between images is bounded by the distance between points transformed by an element B with a norm less than 1.

      In the paper's own words

      “We call a mapping T: X → X a C*-algebra-valued contractive mapping on X, if there exists a B ∈ A with ||B || < 1 such that d (Tx, Ty) ≤ B* d (x, y) B, ∀ x, y ∈ X.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The study defines coincidence points as points where two mappings T and f yield the same result, and compatibility as the condition where these mappings commute at those points. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The study defines coincidence points as points where two mappings T and f yield the same result, and compatibility as the condition where these mappings commute at those points.

      In the paper's own words

      “A point x in X is called a coincidence point (common fixed point) if Tx = fx (Tx = fx = x). Also the pair of mappings T, f: X → X are compativel if they commute on the set of coincidence points.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • The authors introduce a specific contractive condition where mapping T is contractive with respect to another mapping f, using an element B with a norm less than or equal to 1. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors introduce a specific contractive condition where mapping T is contractive with respect to another mapping f, using an element B with a norm less than or equal to 1.

      In the paper's own words

      “We call a mapping T: X → X a C* -algebra-valued contractive mapping on X, if there exists a 𝐵∈_ 𝔸 with ‖𝐵‖ ≤ 1 such that 𝑑(𝑇𝑥, 𝑇𝑦) ≤𝐵∗𝑑(𝑓𝑥, 𝑓𝑦)𝐵”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
  4. What they found

    • In a complete C*-algebra-valued b-metric space, a contractive mapping is guaranteed to have a unique fixed point. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      In a complete C*-algebra-valued b-metric space, a contractive mapping is guaranteed to have a unique fixed point.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 1.1 [7] If (X, A, d) is a complete C*-algebra-valued b-metric space and T: X→X is a contractive mapping, there exists a unique fixed point in X.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction and Preliminaries

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • If T is a contractive mapping with respect to f, and the image of T is a subset of the image of f (which must be a complete subspace), then T and f possess a coincidence point. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      If T is a contractive mapping with respect to f, and the image of T is a subset of the image of f (which must be a complete subspace), then T and f possess a coincidence point.

      In the paper's own words

      “Theorem 2.1 If (X, A, d) is a C* algebra-valued b-metric space and T: X → X is a contractive mapping with respect to mapping f on X. If 𝑇(𝑋) ⊆𝑓(𝑋) and 𝑓(𝑋) is complete subspace of X. Then T and f have coincidence point.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Main Result

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric sets in a mathematical space). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Fixed Point Relationship
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric sets in a mathematical space). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric sets in a mathematical space). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Fixed Point Relationship

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric sets in a mathematical space). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction and Preliminaries

Banach contraction principle is a classical and celebrated result of fixed point theory in metric space. Its application is obvious seen in applied mathematics and physics. In 1993, the axiom for semi metric spaces, was put forth by Czerwik [1] generalizing the Banach contraction principle. Thereafter, many papers have dealt with fixed point theory in such space [2,5] . The relaxation of the triangle of the triangle inequality is also discussed in Fagin and Stock Meyer [6] , who call this new distance measure nonlinear elastic matching. Xia [9] , the authors introduced the concept of C* -algebra-valued metric spaces. The main idea consists in using the set of all positive elements of a unital C* -algebra instead of the set of real numbers. Obviously such spaces generalize the concept of metric spaces. In this paper, as generalization of b-metric spaces and operator-valued metric spaces [12] , we introduce a new type of metric spaces, namely, C* -algebra-valued b-metric spaces, and give some fixed point theorems for self-map with contractive condition on such spaces. To begin with, we collect some definitions and basic facts on the theory of C* -algebras, which will be need in the sequel. Suppose that 𝔸 is a unital algebra with the unit I. An involution on 𝔸 is a conjugate-linear map a →a* on A such that a** = a and (ab)* = b*a* for all a, b ∈ 𝔸. The pair (𝔸, * ) is called a * -algebra [13,14] . A * Banach -algebra is a * -algebra 𝔸 together with a complete sub multiplicative norm such that ||a*a||= ||a|| 2 (∀a∈ 𝔸). Notice that the seeming mild requirement on a C* -algebra above is in fact very strong. It is clear that under the norm topology, L(H), the set of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H, is a C*-algebra. Furthermore, give a C* -algebra 𝔸. there exists a Hilbert space H and a faithfully *representation (𝜋, 𝐻) of A such that 𝜋(𝔸) can be made a closed C* -sub algebra of L (H) [13] . Throughout this paper, by 𝔸 we always denote an unital C*-algebra with a unit I. Set 𝔸 h = {× ∈ 𝔸 : 𝑥 = 𝑥 *}. We call an element 𝑥 ∈ 𝔸 a positive element, denote it by 𝑥 ≥ 0, if 𝑥 ∈ 𝔸 h and 𝜎(𝑥) ⊂(0, ∞), where 𝜎(𝑥 ) is the spectrum of 𝑥. Using positive elements, one can define partial ordering ≤ on 𝑥 𝔸 h as follows: 𝑥 ≤ y and only if {y -x ≥0} and || 𝑥 || = (𝑥* 𝑥 ) 1/2 . Lemma 1.1 [13, 15] suppose that 𝔸 is a unital C*-algebra with a unital I.

(1) For any 𝑥 ∈ 𝔸 + we have

then I-a is invertible and ‖𝑎(𝐼 -𝑎) -1 ‖ < 1 (3) Suppose that a,b ∈ 𝔸 with a,b ≥ 0 and ab =ba then ab ≥ 0.

(4) By 𝔸 we denote the set {a ∈ A:ab = ba, ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝔸}. Let 𝑎 ∈ 𝔸, if 𝑏, 𝑐 ∈ 𝔸 with 𝑏 ≥ 𝑐 ≥ 0, and 𝐼 -𝑎 ∈ 𝔸 + is an invertible 0perator, then

With the help of the positive elements in 𝔸 one can gives the definition a C*-algebra-valued b-metric space. Definition 1.1 [7] Let X be a nonempty set and 𝐴 ∈ 𝔸 such that 𝐴 ≥ 𝐼 Suppose the mapping 𝑑: 𝑋 × 𝑋 → 𝔸 satisfies: 1. 0 ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) for all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 and 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⟺ 𝑥 = 𝑦; 2. 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) for all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋; 3. 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝐴[𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋.

Then d is called a C* algebra-valued b-metric on X and (X, 𝔸, 𝑑) is a C*-algebra-valued b-metric space. Definition 1.2 [7] Let (X, 𝔸, 𝑑) be a C* algebra valued b-metric space. Suppose that-{𝑥 𝑛 } ⊂ 𝑋 and 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋. If for any 𝜖 > 0, there is 𝑁 such that for all 𝑛 > 𝑁, ‖𝑑(𝑥 𝑛 , 𝑥)‖ ≤ 𝜖, then{𝑥 𝑛 } tis said to be converge with respect to 𝔸 and converges to x and x the limit of {𝑥 𝑛 }. We denote it by him-If for any 𝜖 > 0 ther e is N such that for all n, m >N, ‖𝑑(𝑥 𝑛 , 𝑥 𝑚 )‖ ≤ 𝜖 then {𝑥 𝑛 } is called a Cauchy sequence with respect to. We say ( X, 𝔸, 𝑑)is a complete C* algebra valued be metric space if every Cauchy sequence with respect to 𝔸 is converge. Remark 1.1 If 𝔸 = 1 then the ordinary triangle inequality in a C* -algebra-valued metric space satisfied. Thus a C* -algebravalued b-metric space is an ordinary C*-algebra-valued metric space. In particular, if 𝔸 = 𝐶 and 𝔸 = 1, the C*-algebra-valued bmetric spaced are just the ordinary metric space. The following example illustrates that, in general, a C *algebra valued metric space, one can see [11]. Example 1.1 Let X = 𝔸 and A = Mn (R). Define d (x,y) = diag (c1 |x-y| p, c2 |x-y| p, C2 |x-y| p, …., Cn |x-y| p ) with 'diag' denotes a diagonal matrix and x,y 𝜖 R, Ci > 0 (i = 1,2,…,n) are constants and p>1. It is easy to verify that d (x,y) is a complete C*-algebravalued b-metric, for proving (3) of Definition 1.1 we only need to use the following inequality: |x-y| p ≤ 2(|𝑥 -𝑧| p + |z-y| p ), Which implies that d(x,y) ≤ A [d (x,z)+ d (z,y)] for all x,y,z ∈ X, where A = X, where A = 2 p I ∈ A' and A> I by 2 p > 1. But |x-y| p + |z-y| p is impossible for all x > z> y [16]. Thus (X, Mn (R), d) is not a C*-algebra-valued metric space. Definition 1.3 [7] suppose that (X, A, d) is a C*-algebra-valued be-metric space. We call a mapping T: X → X a C*-algebra-valued contractive mapping on X, if there exists a B ∈ A with ||B || < 1 such that d (Tx, Ty) ≤ B* d (x, y) B, ∀ x, y ∈ X. Definition 1.4 [8] suppose that (X, A, d) is a C*-algebra-valued b-metric space and T, f: X → X be the self-mappings. A point x in X is called a coincidence point (common fixed point) if Tx = fx (Tx = fx = x). Also the pair of mappings T, f: X → X are compativel if they commute on the set of coincidence points. Theorem 1.1 [7] If (X, A, d) is a complete C*-algebra-valued b-metric space and T: X→X is a contractive mapping, there exists a unique fixed point in X.

Main Result

First, we give the definition of a contractive mapping with respect to another mapping. Definition 2.1 Suppose that (X, A, d) is a C*-algebra-valued b-metric space. We call a mapping T: X → X a C* -algebra-valued contractive mapping on X, if there exists a 𝐵 ∈_ 𝔸 with ‖𝐵‖ ≤ 1 such that 𝑑(𝑇𝑥, 𝑇𝑦) ≤ 𝐵 * 𝑑(𝑓𝑥, 𝑓𝑦)𝐵 Theorem 2.1 If (X, A, d) is a C* algebra-valued b-metric space and T: X → X is a contractive mapping with respect to mapping f on X. If 𝑇(𝑋) ⊆ 𝑓(𝑋) and 𝑓(𝑋) is complete subspace of X. Then T and f have coincidence point. Further if T and f are compatible, then there exists a unique fixed point of T and f in X. Proof: It is clear that if B=0 T maps the X into a single point. Thus without loss of generality, one can suppose that 𝐵 ≠ 0. Let 𝑥 0 be any arbitrary point in X. Choose a point 𝑥 1 in X such that 𝑇𝑥 0 = 𝑓(𝑥 1 ). It is possible due to 𝑇(𝑋) ⊆ 𝑓(𝑋). Continuing this process indefinitely, for each 𝑛 in X, one can find a 𝑥 𝑛+1 such that 𝑦 𝑛 = 𝑇𝑥 𝑛 = 𝑓(𝑥 𝑛+1 ). Without loss of generality, one may assume that 𝑦 𝑛+1 ≠ 𝑦 𝑛 for all n in N, otherwise f ande T have coincidence point. For convenience, by 𝐵 0 we denote the element 𝑑(𝑥 1 , 𝑥 1 ) in 𝔸. In case𝑦 𝑛+1 ≠ 𝑦 𝑛 we have Notice that in a C* -algebra, if 𝑎, 𝑏 ∈ 𝔸 + and 𝑎 ≤ 𝑏, then for any 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 both 𝑥 * 𝑎𝑥 and 𝑥 * 𝑏𝑥 are positive elements and 𝑥 * 𝑎𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 * 𝑏𝑥 [13]

References

17 in the original paper
  1. Czerwik S. Contraction mapping in b-metric spaces. Acta Math. Inform, Univ. Ostrav. 1993; 1:5-11.
  2. Bakhtin IA. The contraction mapping principle in almost metric spaces, Funct. Anal. Gos Ped. Inst. Ulianowsk. 1989; 30:2637.
  3. Boriceanu M, Bota M, Pertusel A. Mutivalued fractuals in b-matric spaces. Atti Semin. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena. 1998; 46:236-276
  4. Czerwik S. Nonlinear set-Valued contraction mappings in b-metric spaces. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 2010; 8(2):367-377.
  5. Hussian N, Shah MH. KKM mappings in cone b-metric spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011; 62:1677-1684
  6. Fagin R, stackmeyer L. relaxing the triangle ineguality in pattern matching. INt. J. Comput. Vis. 1998; 30(3):219-231.
  7. Zhenhua Ma, Lining Jiang C. Algebra-valued b-meric spaces and related fixed point theorams, Springer, 2015.
  8. Xia Q. The geodesic problem in quasimetric spaces. J. Geom. Anal. 2009; 19(2):452-479.
  9. Kirk W, Shahzad N. Fixed point Theory in Distance Spaces. Springer, Cham, 2014.
  10. Ma Zh, Jiang LN, Sun HZ. C*-algebras-valued metric spaces and related fixed theorems. Fixed point theory appl. 2014, 206.
  11. Ma ZH, Jiang, LN Xin, QL. Fixed point therems on operator -values matric space. Trans. Beijing Inst. Techol. 2014; 34(10):1078-1080.
  12. Murphy Gj. C*-algebras and Operator theory. Achademic press, London, 1990.
  13. Douglas RG. Branch Algebra Techniques in Operator theory. Springer, Berlin, 1998.
  14. Huang HP, Xu SY. Fixed point theorems of cotractive mapping in cone b-metric spaces and applications. Fixed Point theory Appl. 2013, 112.
  15. Chatterjea, SK. Fixed -point theorems. C.R. Acad. Bulagare Sci. 1972; 25:727-730.
  16. Kannan R. Some results on fixed point II. Am. Math. Mon. 1969; 76:405-408.
  17. Ran ACm, Recuring MCB. A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2014; 132(5):1435-1433.