Scinovex

Research article · 2016 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

Product of finitely permutable groups

Behnam Razzaghmaneshi

Volume 1(2) · Pages 42–45

Research areasgraph theory and CDMA systemsFinite Group Theory ResearchCoding theory and cryptography

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

In this paper we show that if A1,A2,…,An are finitely many pairwise permutable abelian min-by-max subgroups of the group G such that G=A1…An, then J(G)=J(A1)…J(An), which J(G) finitely residual of a group G.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • The study of factorized groups has a history of significant results, such as Itô's theorem stating that the product of two abelian groups is metabelian. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The study of factorized groups has a history of significant results, such as Itô's theorem stating that the product of two abelian groups is metabelian.

      In the paper's own words

      “In 1955 N. Itô (See [7]) found an impressive and very satisfying theorem for arbitrary factorized groups. He proved that every product of two abelian groups is metabelian.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • A general research question in this field is determining whether a product group G inherits a specific finiteness condition 'x' from its factor subgroups. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      A general research question in this field is determining whether a product group G inherits a specific finiteness condition 'x' from its factor subgroups.

      In the paper's own words

      “Given a (soluble) product G of two subgroups A and B satisfying a certain finiteness condition x , when does G have the same finiteness condition x ?”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • For most finiteness conditions, the answer is generally affirmative for soluble or soluble-by-finite groups. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      For most finiteness conditions, the answer is generally affirmative for soluble or soluble-by-finite groups.

      In the paper's own words

      “For almost all finiteness conditions this question has meanwhile been solved. Roughly speaking, the answer is 'yes' for soluble (and even for soluble-by-finite) groups.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The paper aims to investigate the relationship between the finite residual group and min-by-max subgroups within a group G. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The paper aims to investigate the relationship between the finite residual group and min-by-max subgroups within a group G.

      In the paper's own words

      “Now, in this paper, we study the residual finite group and min-by-max subgroups of the group G and its relations”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The author analyzes a group G formed by the product of a finite number of abelian min-by-max subgroups that are pairwise permutable. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The author analyzes a group G formed by the product of a finite number of abelian min-by-max subgroups that are pairwise permutable.

      In the paper's own words

      “Let the group G= A1…At be the product of finitely many pairwise permutable abelian min-by-max subgroups A1,…,At.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Main Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The methodology involves establishing a series of elementary lemmas and theorems in a preliminary chapter to build the proof for the main theorem. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The methodology involves establishing a series of elementary lemmas and theorems in a preliminary chapter to build the proof for the main theorem.

      In the paper's own words

      “For do this, in chapter 2 we express the elementary lemmas and Theorems and in chapter three we prove the main Theorem.”

      Page 1

      Found in:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  4. What they found

    • The author finds that a group G which is the product of finitely many pairwise permutable abelian min-by-max subgroups is itself a soluble min-by-max group. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The author finds that a group G which is the product of finitely many pairwise permutable abelian min-by-max subgroups is itself a soluble min-by-max group.

      In the paper's own words

      “Then G is a soluble min-by-max group”

      Page 3

      Found in: Main Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • The finite residual of the group G, denoted as J(G), is equal to the product of the finite residuals of its factor subgroups, J(A1)...J(At). View evidence ↗

      What they found

      The finite residual of the group G, denoted as J(G), is equal to the product of the finite residuals of its factor subgroups, J(A1)...J(At).

      In the paper's own words

      “and J(G)=J(A1)…J(At).”

      Page 3

      Found in: Main Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • Because G is a soluble minimax group, its finite residual J(G) is abelian. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Because G is a soluble minimax group, its finite residual J(G) is abelian.

      In the paper's own words

      “It follows from Theorem 2.17 that G is soluble minimax group, and hence J=J(G) is abelian.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Main Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The author concludes that the group G is a min-by-max group and its finite residual is exactly the product of the finite residuals of its components. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The author concludes that the group G is a min-by-max group and its finite residual is exactly the product of the finite residuals of its components.

      In the paper's own words

      “This proves that G is a min-by-max group and J=L=J1...Jt.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Main Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric representations of mathematical groups as overlapping translucent spheres). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Decomposition of the Finite Residual
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric representations of mathematical groups as overlapping translucent spheres). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric representations of mathematical groups as overlapping translucent spheres). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Decomposition of the Finite Residual

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric representations of mathematical groups as overlapping translucent spheres). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction

In 1940 G. Zappa (See [21] ) and in 1950 J. Szip (See [20] ) studied bout products of groups concerned finite groups. In 1961 O.H. Kegel (See [8] ) and in 1958 H. Wielandt (See [10] ) expressed the famous theorem, whose states the solubility of all finite products of two nilpotent groups. In 1955 N. Itô (See [7] ) found an impressive and very satisfying theorem for arbitrary factorized groups. He proved that every product of two abelian groups is metabelian. Besides that, there were only a few isolated papers dealing with infinite factorized groups. P.M. Cohn (1956) (See [18] ) and L. Redei (1950)(See [19] ) considered products of cyclic groups, and around 1965 O.H. Kegel (See [23,24] ) looked at linear and locally finite factorized groups. In 1968 N.F. Sesekin (See [16] ) proved that a product of two abelian subgroups with minimal condition satisfies also the minimal condition. He and Amberg independently obtained a similar result for the maximal condition around 1972 (See [17,1] ). Moreover, a little later the proved that a soluble product of two nilpotent subgroups with maximal condition likewise satisfies the maximal condition, and its Fitting subgroups inherits the factorization. Subsequently in his Habilitationsschrift (1973) he started a more systematic investigation of the following general question. Given a (soluble) product G of two subgroups A and B satisfying a certain finiteness condition x , when does G have the same finiteness condition x ?(See [17] )

For almost all finiteness conditions this question has meanwhile been solved. Roughly speaking, the answer is 'yes' for soluble (and even for soluble-by-finite) groups. This combines theorems of B. Amberg (See [1][2][3][4]6] ), N.S. Chernikov (See [5] ), S. Franciosi, F. de Giovanni (See [3, 6, 25-29] ), O.H. Kegel (See [8] ), J.C. Lennox (See [12] ), D.J.S. Robinson (See [9,14] ), J.E. Roseblade (See [13] ), Y.P. Sysak (See [30][31][32][33] ), J.S. Wilson (See [34] ), and D.I. Zaitsev (See [11,15] ). Now, in this paper, we study the residual finite group and min-by-max subgroups of the group G and its relations, and the end we prove that if ). ...J(A ) J(A J(G) n 1

For do this, in chapter 2 we express the elementary lemmas and Theorems and in chapter three we prove the main Theorem.

Preliminaries: (Elementary properties and Theorems.)

In this chapter we express the elementary Lemma and difinitons whose used in prove the Man Theorem in chapter 2.1. Theorem (See [11,12] ): If the soluble-by-finite group G=AB is the product of two polycyclic-by-finite subgroups A and B, then G is polycyclic-by-finite.

Proof: Assume that G it not polycyclic-by-finite. Then G contains an abelian normal section U/V which is either torsion-free or periodic and is not finitely generated. Clearly the factorizer of U/V in G/V is also a counterexample. Hence we may suppose that G has a triple factorization G=AB=AK=BK, Where K is an abelian normal subgroup of G which is either torsion-free or periodic. By Lemma 1.2.6(i) of [4] (See also [17] ) the group G satisfies the maximal condition on normal subgroups, so that it contains a normal subgroup M which is maximal with respect to the condition that G/M is not polycyclic-by-finite. Thus it can be assumed that every proper factor group of G is polycylic-by-finite. [15] ): Let the soluble group G=AB be the product of two subgroups A and B with finite abelian section rank. If at least one of the factors A and B has an ascending normal series with central or periodic factors, then G also has finite abelian section rank.

Theorem (See

Proof: See ( [4] , Theorem 4.6.10). [6] ): Let the group G=AB=AK=BK be the product of three nilpotent subgroups A, B, and K, where K is normal in G. If K is minimax, then G is nilpotent.

3. Theorem (See

Proof: See ( [4] , Theorem 6.3.4). [6] ): Let the group G=AB=AK=BK be the product of two subgroups A and B and a minimax normal subgroup K of G. (i) if A,B, and K are locally nilpotent, then G is locally nilpotent. (ii) If A, B, and K are hypercentral, then G is hypercentral.

4.Theorem (See

Proof: See ( [4] , Theorem 6.3.7).

Lemma:

Let the group G=AB be the product of two abelian subgroups A and B such that AG=BG=1. Then the following hold.

of G does not have nontrivial normal subgroups which are contained in A or B, so that in particular Z(X)=1.

(iv) The FC-centre of G is trivial.

Proof: (i) They Lemma 2.7 we have that

and so is also trivial. (ii)This follows from the first part of the proof of Lemma 2.9. (iii) Let N be a normal subgroup of X contained in A. Then G normalizes N, so that by (ii)

(iv) Let a be an element of F A  , where F is the FC-centre of G. Since G is abelian by Theorem 2.5, the mapping

6 Theorem: (See [22] ): Let the group G=AB 1  be the product of two abelian subgroups A and B, at least one of which has finite section rank. Then there exists a non-trivial normal subgroup of G contained in A or B.

Proof:

And its centre is trivial by Lemma 2.15(iii). The subgroups

are isomorphic, and hence both have finite section rank. By Theorem 2.12 the metabelian group X has finite abelian section rank, and hence is hypercentral by Theorem 2.14. In particular 1, Z(X)  a contradiction.

2.17 Theorem: (See [35] ): Let the group G=A1…At be the product of finitely many pairwise permutable abelian minimax subgroups A1,…,At. Then G is a soluble minimax group. Proof: Assume that the theorem is false, and let G= A1…At be a counterexample for which the sum

It follows that D G is a soluble minimax group. On the other hand, the factor group

Let Ji be the finite residual of Ai for every i=1,…,t. It follows from lemma 2.15 that j i J J is the finite residual of the soluble minimax group AiAj, so that it is abelian. Hence

then N/M has finite exponent and hence is finite. Therefore M is an infinite normal subgroup of

This contradiction proves the theorem.

Main Result:

In this chapter by used the Lemmas and Theorems of chaper 2, we prove the Basic theorem of this paper as follows.

Main Theorem:

Let the group G= A1…At be the product of finitely many pairwise permutable abelian min-by-max subgroups A1,…,At. Then G is a soluble min-by-max group and J(G)=J(A1)…J(At).

Proof: It follows from Theorem 2.17 that G is soluble minimax group, and hence J=J(G) is abelian. Put ) J(A J i i  for each i=1,…,t. Then This proves that G is a min-by-max group and J=L=J1...Jt.

References

30 in the original paper
  1. Amberg B. Factorizations of Infinite Groups. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Mainz. 1973.
  2. Amberg B. Lokal endlich-auflösbare Produkte von zwei hyperzentralen Gruppen. Arch. Math. (Basel) 1980; 35:228-238.
  3. Ambrg B, Franciosi S, de Giovanni F. Rank formulae for factorized groups. Ukrain. Mat. Z. 1991; 43:1078-1084.
  4. Amberg B, Franciosi S, de Gioranni F. Products of Groups. Oxford University Press Inc., New York. 1992.
  5. Itô N. Über das Produkt von zwei abelschen Gruppen. Math Z. 1955; 62:400-401.
  6. Kegel OH. Produkte nilpotenter Gruppen. Arch. Math. (Basel) 1961; 12:90-93.
  7. Robinson DJS. Soluble products of nilpotent groups. J. Algebra. 1986; 98:183-196.
  8. Lennox JC, Roseblade JE. Soluble products of polycyclic groups. Math. Z. 1980; 170:153-154.
  9. Roseblade JE. On groups in which every subgroup is subnormal. J Algebra. 1965; 2:402-412.
  10. Kovacs LG. On finite soluble groups. Math. Z. 1968; 103:37-39.
  11. Robinson DJS. Finiteness Conditions and Generalized Soluble Groups. Springer, Berlin. 1972.
  12. Kegel OH, Wehrfritz BAF. Locally Finite Groups. NorthHolland, Amsterdam. 1973.
  13. Jetegaonker AV. Integral group rings of polycyclic-byfinite groups. J Pure Appl. Algebra. 1974; 4:337-343.
  14. Zaitsev DI. Soluble factorized groups. In Structure of Groups and Subgroup Characterizations, Akad. Nauk Ukrain. Inst. Mat. Kiev (in Russian). 1984, 15-33.
  15. Sesekin NF. Product of finitely connected abelian groups. Sib. Mat. Z. 1968; 9:1427-1430. (Sib. Math. J. 9, 10701072.)
  16. Sesekin NF. On the product of two finitely generated abelian groups. Mat. Zametki. 1973; 13:443-446. (Math. Notes 13, 266-268)
  17. Cohn PM. A remark on the general product of two infinite cyclic groups. Arch. Math. (Basel). 1956; 7:94-99.
  18. Redei L. Zur Theorie der faktorisierbaren Gruppen I. Acta Math. Hungar. 1950; 1:74-98.
  19. Szep J. On factorisable, not simple groups. Acta Univ. Szeged Sect. Sci. Math. 1950; 13:239-241.
  20. Zappa G. Sulla costruzione dei gruppi prodotto di due dati sottogruppi permutabili tra loro. In Atti del Secondo Congresso dell'Unione Matematica Italiana, Cremonese, Rome. 1940, 119-125.
  21. Zatisev DI. Products of abelian groups. Algebra i Logika. 1980; 19:150-172. (Algebra and Logic 19, 94-106.)
  22. Franciosi S, de Giovanni F. On trifactorized soluble of finite rank. Geom. Dedicata. 1992; 38:331-341.
  23. Franciosi S, de Giovanni F. On the Hirsch-Plotkin radical of a factorized group. Glasgow Math. J. To appear. 1992.
  24. Franciosi S, de Giovanni F, Heineken H, Newell ML. On the Fitting length of a soluble product of nilpotent groups. Arch. Math. (Basel). 1991; 57:313-318.
  25. Sysak YP. Products of infinite groups. Preprint Akad. Nauk Ukrain. Inst. Mat. Kiev (in Russian). 1982; 82:53.
  26. Sysak YP. Products of locally cyclic torsion-free groups. Algebra i Logika. 1986; 25:672-686. (Algebra and Logic 25, 425-433.)
  27. Sysak YP. On products of almost abelian groups. In Researches on Groups with Restrictions on Subgroups, Akad. Nauk Ukrain. Inst. Mat. Kiev (in Russian). 1988, 81-85.
  28. Sysak YP. Radical modules over groups of finite rank. Preprint Akad. Nauk Ukrain. Inst. Mat., Kiev (in Russian). 1989; 89:18.
  29. Wilson JS. On products of soluble groups of finite rank. Comment. Math. Helv. 1985; 60:337-353.
  30. Tomkinson MJ. Products of abelian subgroups. Arch. Math. (Basel) 1986; 42:107-112.