Scinovex

Research article · 2016 · Full text

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics

Some Propertıes of Rw-Locally Closed Sets In Topologıcal Spaces

R. S. WaliPrabhavati S Mandalageri

Volume 1(1) · Pages 46–51

Research areasFuzzy and Soft Set Theory

↓ Read full-text PDF0 citations

Abstract

Author-written

In this paper, we introduce three weaker forms of locally closed sets called RW-LC sets, RW-LC* set and RW-LC** sets each of which is weaker than locally closed set and study some of their properties in topologivcal spaces.

Summary

Source-checked

Plain-language reading of the full paper, prepared with AI and checked against the text. Each point links to the authors' own words.

  1. Why it matters

    • Locally closed sets are a known concept in topological spaces, originally introduced by Kuratowski and Sierpinski. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      Locally closed sets are a known concept in topological spaces, originally introduced by Kuratowski and Sierpinski.

      In the paper's own words

      “Kuratowski and Sierpinski [11] introduced the notion of locally closed sets in topological spaces.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • A subset is defined as locally closed if it can be expressed as the intersection of an open set and a closed set. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      A subset is defined as locally closed if it can be expressed as the intersection of an open set and a closed set.

      In the paper's own words

      “According to Bourbaki [6], a subset of a topological space (X, τ) is locally closed in (X, τ) if it is the intersection of an open set and a closed set in (X, τ).”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
    • The concept of rw-closed sets was recently introduced as a generalization of standard closed sets. View evidence ↗

      Why it matters

      The concept of rw-closed sets was recently introduced as a generalization of standard closed sets.

      In the paper's own words

      “Recently as a generalization of closed sets rw-closed sets and continuous maps were introduced and studied by Benchalli et al. [12].”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  2. The question

    • The authors aim to introduce and study the properties of three new types of sets, RW-LC, RW-LC*, and RW-LC**, which are weaker forms of locally closed sets. View evidence ↗

      The question

      The authors aim to introduce and study the properties of three new types of sets, RW-LC, RW-LC*, and RW-LC**, which are weaker forms of locally closed sets.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper, we introduce three weaker forms of locally closed sets called RW-LC sets, RW-LC* set and RW-LC** sets each of which is weaker than locally closed set and study some of their properties in topologivcal spaces.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗
  3. What they did

    • The authors define an RW-LC set as the intersection of an rw-open set and an rw-closed set. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      The authors define an RW-LC set as the intersection of an rw-open set and an rw-closed set.

      In the paper's own words

      “A Subset A of t.s (X, τ) is called rw-locally closed (briefly RW-LC) if A=U F where U is rw-open in (X, τ) and F is rw-closed in (X, τ).”

      Page 2

      Found in: rw-locally closed sets in topological spaces 3.1 Definition:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • An RW-LC* set is defined as the intersection of an rw-open set and a closed set. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      An RW-LC* set is defined as the intersection of an rw-open set and a closed set.

      In the paper's own words

      “A subset A of (X, τ) is called a RW-LC* set if there exists a rw-open set G and a closed F of (X, τ) s.t A=G F”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • An RW-LC** set is defined as the intersection of an open set and an rw-closed set. View evidence ↗

      What they did

      An RW-LC** set is defined as the intersection of an open set and an rw-closed set.

      In the paper's own words

      “A subset B of (X, τ) is called a RW-LC** set if there exists an open set G and rw closed set F of (X, τ) s.t B=G F”

      Page 3

      Found in: Definition:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
  4. What they found

    • All locally closed sets are RW-LC sets, but not all RW-LC sets are locally closed. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      All locally closed sets are RW-LC sets, but not all RW-LC sets are locally closed.

      In the paper's own words

      “Every locally closed set is a RW-LC set but not conversely.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Every w-locally closed (w-lc) set is an RW-LC set, though the reverse is not always true. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Every w-locally closed (w-lc) set is an RW-LC set, though the reverse is not always true.

      In the paper's own words

      “Every w-lc set is a RW-LC set but not conversely.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • RW-LC sets are a subset of rg-lc sets, but not all rg-lc sets are RW-LC. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      RW-LC sets are a subset of rg-lc sets, but not all rg-lc sets are RW-LC.

      In the paper's own words

      “Every RW-LC set is rg-lc set but not conversely.”

      Page 2

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 2 ↗
    • Locally closed sets are both RW-LC* and RW-LC** sets, and both RW-LC* and RW-LC** sets are types of RW-LC sets. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      Locally closed sets are both RW-LC* and RW-LC** sets, and both RW-LC* and RW-LC** sets are types of RW-LC sets.

      In the paper's own words

      “Every locally closed set is a RW-LC* set. 2. Every locally closed set is a RW-LC** set. 3. Every RW-LC* set is RW-LC set. 4. Every RW-LC** set is RW-LC set.”

      Page 3

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 3 ↗
    • When every rw-open set is open (RWO(X, τ) = τ), RW-LC sets become equivalent to both locally closed (LC) and w-locally closed (W-LC) sets. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      When every rw-open set is open (RWO(X, τ) = τ), RW-LC sets become equivalent to both locally closed (LC) and w-locally closed (W-LC) sets.

      In the paper's own words

      “If RWO(X, τ) = τ then (i) RW-LC(X, τ) = LC (X, τ). (ii) RW-LC(X, τ) = W-LC (X, τ).”

      Page 4

      Found in: Theorem:

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 4 ↗
    • A topological space is RW-submaximal if and only if every subset of the space is an RW-LC* set. View evidence ↗

      What they found

      A topological space is RW-submaximal if and only if every subset of the space is an RW-LC* set.

      In the paper's own words

      “A topological space (X, τ) RW-submaximal if and only if P(X) = RW-LC*(X, τ).”

      Page 6

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 6 ↗
  5. What it means

    • The authors conclude that they have successfully defined and characterized the properties of RW-LC, RW-LC*, and RW-LC** sets as generalizations of locally closed sets. View evidence ↗

      What it means

      The authors conclude that they have successfully defined and characterized the properties of RW-LC, RW-LC*, and RW-LC** sets as generalizations of locally closed sets.

      In the paper's own words

      “In this paper, we introduce three weaker forms of locally closed sets called RW-LC sets, RW-LC* set and RW-LC** sets each of which is weaker than locally closed set and study some of their properties in topologivcal spaces.”

      Page 1

      Found in: Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

      Read it in the full textOpen PDF at page 1 ↗

Visual summary

1 visuals

Illustrations explain the paper; they do not show study data.

AI-generated illustration
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric shapes representing mathematical sets in a topological space). It explains the idea and does not show study data.↗ Enlarge
Hierarchy of Locally Closed Set Generalizations
AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric shapes representing mathematical sets in a topological space). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric shapes representing mathematical sets in a topological space). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

Open full-size image ↗

Hierarchy of Locally Closed Set Generalizations

AI-generated conceptual illustration (Abstract geometric shapes representing mathematical sets in a topological space). It explains the idea and does not show study data.

View source evidence ↗
FULL TEXT Original article · reflowed for reading

Introduction Kuratowski and Sierpinski

introduced the notion of locally closed sets in topological spaces. According to Bourbaki [6] , a subset of a topological space (X, τ) is locally closed in (X, τ) if it is the intersection of an open set and a closed set in (X, τ). Stone [2] has used the term FG for locally closed set. Ganster and Reilly [7] have introduced locally closed sets, which are weaker forms of both closed and open sets. After that Balachandran et al. [2,3] , Gnanambal [10] , Arockiarani et al. [1] , Pusphalatha [12] and Sheik John [13] have introduced α-locally closed, generalized α-locally closed, semi locally closed, semi generalized locally closed, regular generalized locally closed, strongly locally closed and w-locally closed sets and their continuous maps in topological space respectively. Recently as a generalization of closed sets rw-closed sets and continuous maps were introduced and studied by Benchalli et al. [12] . A subset A of a topological space (X, T) is said to be rw-closed set if Cl(A) U whenever A U and U is semi regular-open.

16. g-lc set if A=U F [3] where U is g-open and F is l g-closed in X. 17. l g-lc* set if A=U F [3] where U is g-open and F closed in X. 18. l g-lc** set if A=U F [3] where U is open and F is l g-closed in X. 19. αrω-lc set if A=U F [14] where U is αrω-open and F is αrω-closed in X. 20. αrω-lc* set if A=U F [14] where U is αrω-open and F is closed in X. 21. αrω-lc** set if A=U F [14] where U is open and F is αrω-closed in X.

2.1 Lemma: [14] (i) Every closed set is rw-closed set. (ii) Every w-closed set is rw-closed set.

(iii) Every -closed set is rw-closed set. (iv) Every -closed set is rw-closed set. (v) Every rw-closed set is rg-closed set.

Lemma:

The space (X, τ) is Trw-space if every rw-closed set is closed set.

rw-locally closed sets in topological spaces 3.1 Definition:

A Subset A of t.s (X, τ) is called rw-locally closed (briefly RW-LC) if A=U F where U is rw-open in (X, τ) and F is rw-closed in (X, τ). The set of all rw-locally closed sets of (X, τ) is denoted by RW-LC(X, τ). (ii) Let X={a, b, c, d} and Τ ={X, , {a}, {b}, {a, b},{a, b, c}} then {c} is RW-LC but not l gc-lc set in (X, τ).

Remark:

-g lc sets and RW-LC sets are independent of each other as seen from the following example 3.17 Example: i) Let X={a,b,c,d} and τ ={X, ,{a},{b},{a,b},{a,b,c}} then {b,d} is -g -lc but not RW-LC set in (X, τ).

(ii) Let X={a,b,c} and τ ={X, ,{a},{a,b},{a,c}} then {a,b} is RW-LC but not -g-lc set in (X, τ).

Definition:

A subset A of (X, τ) is called a RW-LC * set if there exists a rw-open set G and a closed F of (X, τ) s.t A=G F the collection of all RW-LC* sets of (X, τ) will be denoted by RW-LC*(X, τ).

Definition:

A subset B of (X, τ) is called a RW-LC ** set if there exists an open set G and rw closed set F of (X, τ) s.t B=G F the collection of all RW-LC** sets of (X, τ) will be denoted by RW-LC**(X, τ). (iii) The set {c} is RW-LC* set but not a w-lc* set in (X, τ). (iv) The set {c} is RW-LC** set but not a w-lc** set in (X, τ).

Theorem

Theorem

Example:

Let X={a,b,c,d} and τ ={ X, ,{a},{b},{a,b},{a,b,c}} (i) The set {a,b,d} is RW-LC set but not a RW-LC* set in (X, τ). (ii) The set {a,d} is rg-lc* set but not a RW-LC* set in (X, τ). (iii) The set {a,d} is rg-lc* set but not a RW-LC* set in (X, τ). (iv) The set {b,d} is rg-lc set but not a RW-LC* set in (X, τ). (v) The set {b,d} is rg-lc set but not a RW-LC** set in (X, τ). (vi) The set {b,d} is αrω-lc set but not a RW-LC set in (X, τ).

Example:

Let X={a,b,c,d} and τ ={ X, ,{a},{b},{a,d},{a,b,d}} (i) The set {b} is RW-LC* set but not a -lc* set in (X, τ). (ii) The set {d} is RW-LC** set but not a -lc** set in (X, τ).

Example:

Let X={a,b,c} and τ ={ X, ,{a},{c},{a,c},{b,c}} (i) The set {c} is RW-LC* set but not a c set in (X, τ). (ii) The set {c} is RW-LC** set but not a c set in (X, τ).

Example: i ) Let

X={a,b,c,d} and τ ={ X, ,{a},{b},{a,b}} then the set {c} is RW-LC set but not a RW-LC** set in (X, τ) ii) Let X={a,b,c} and τ ={ X, ,{a},{b,c}} then the set {c} is RW-LC set but not a αrω-lc set in (X, τ). (ii) Let X={a,b,c,d} and τ ={ X, ,{a},{b},{a,b}} then set {c} is RW-LC* set but not a RW-LC** set in (X, τ).

Remark:

From the above discussion and known results we have the following implications in the diagram.

Theorem:

If RWO(X, τ) = τ then (i) RW-LC(X, τ) = LC (X, τ). (ii) RW-LC(X, τ) = W-LC (X, τ). (iii)RW-LC(X, τ)  GLC (X, τ).

Proof: (i) For any space (X, τ), W.k.t LC(X, τ)  RW-LC(X, τ). Since RWO(X, τ) = τ, that is every rw-open set is open and every rw-closed set is closed in (X, τ), RW-LC(X, τ) LC (X, τ); hence RW-LC(X, τ) = LC (X, τ). (ii) For any space (X, τ), LC(X, τ) W-LC(X, τ) RW-LC(X, τ) From (i) it follows that RW-LC(X, τ) = W-LC(X, τ). (iii) For any space (X, τ), LC(X, τ) GLC (X, τ) from (i) RW-LC(X, τ) = LC (X, τ) and hence RW-LC(X, τ) GLC (X, τ).

Theorem:

If RWO(X, τ) = τ, then RW-LC*(X, τ) = RW-LC** (X, τ) = RW-LC(X, τ). Proof: For any space,(X, τ) LC (X, τ)  RW-LC*(X, τ)  RW-LC(X, τ) and LC (X, τ)  RW-LC**(X, τ)  RW-LC(X, τ) since RWO(X, τ) = τ. RW-LC(X, τ) =LC(X, τ) by theorem 3.39,it follows that LC(X, τ) =RW-LC*(X, τ) = RW-LC**(X, τ) = RW-LC(X, τ).

Remark:

The converse of the theorem 3.40 need not be true in general as seen from the following example.

Example:

Let X={a, b, c} with the topology τ= { X, , {a}, {b}, {a,b}} then RW-LC*(X, τ) = RW-LC**(X, τ) = RW-LC(X, τ) =P(X). However RWO(X, τ) ={ X, , {a}, {b}, {c}, {a,b} } τ.

Theorem:

If GO(X, τ) = τ, then GLC(X, τ)  RW-LC(X, τ) Proof: For any space (X, τ) w.k.t LC(X, τ)  GLC(X, τ) and LC (X, τ) RW-LC(X, τ).....(i) GO(X, τ) =T, that is every g-open set is open and every g-closed set is closed in (X, τ) and so GLC(X, τ) LC(X, τ) that is GLC(X, τ) =LC(X, τ)......(ii) from (i) and (ii) we have GLC(X, τ)  RW-LC(X, τ). From (i) and (ii) we have RW-LC(X, τ) = RW-LC*(X, τ).

Remark:

The converse of the theorem 3.44 need not be true in general as seen from the following example.

Example:

Consider X= {a,b,c,d} and τ = { X, ,{a,b},{c,d}},then RW-LC(X, τ) = RW-LC*(X, τ) =P(X). But RWC(X, τ) =P(X) and LC(X, τ) = { X, ,{a,b},{c,d}} That is RWC(X, τ) LC(X, τ).

Theorem:

For a subset A of (X, τ) if A RW-LC(X, τ) then A = U (rw-cl(A)) for some open set U.

References

14 in the original paper
  1. Pushpalatha A. Studies on generalizations of mappings in topological spaces, Ph.D., thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 2000.
  2. Kuratowski C, Sierpinski W. Sur les differences deux ensembles fermes, Tohoku Math. Jl. 1921; 20:22-25.
  3. Perk HP, Perk JK. on locally c-continuous functions,solitions and fractals 2004; 19:995-1002.
  4. Arockiarani I, Balachandran K, Ganster M. Regular generalized locally closed sets and rgl-continuous functions, Indian J Pure Appl Math. 1997; 28:661-669.
  5. Balachandran K, sundaram P, Maki H. g-lc and glc-continuous function, indian j pure appp Math. 1966; 27:235-244.
  6. Ganster M, Reilly IL. locally closed sets ad lc-contınuous function internret, j math sci. 1989; 12:417-424.
  7. Sheik john M. a study on generalization of closed sets on continuous maps in topological & bitopological spaces, Ph.D thesis, Bharathiar university, Coimbatore, 2002.
  8. Stone M. Application of the theorey of boolean rings to general topology, trans, amer, math, soc, al, 1937, 374-481.
  9. Bourkbaki N. General topology, part I adison-wesley, reading mass., 1966.
  10. Wali RS, Mandalgeri PS. On α Regular ω-closed sets in topological spaces, Int. J ofMath Archive. 2014; 5(10):68-76.
  11. Wali RS, Mandalgeri PS. On α Regular ω-open sets in topological spaces, J of comp & Math Sci. 2014; 5(6):490-499.
  12. Benchalli SS, Wali RS. on rw-Closed sets is Topological Spaces, Bull, Malays, Math, sci, soc. 2007; 30:99-110.
  13. Gnanambal Y. On generalized pre regular closed sets in topological spaces, Indian J Pure Appl Math. 1997; 28(3):351-360.
  14. Gnanambal Y. On generalized pre-regular Closed sets and generalized of locally closed sets in Topological Spaces, Ph.D thesis, Bharathiar university, Coimbatore, 1998.