article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Designs

Medical Care · 2012 · Vol. 50(3) · pp. 217–226

Geoffrey M. Curran✉(University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences)Mark S. Bauer(VA Boston Healthcare System)Brian S. Mittman(VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System)Jeffrey M. Pyne✉(Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System)Cheryl B. Stetler(VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System)

View via DOI Publisher page

Abstract

The hybrid typology proposed herein must be considered a construct still in evolution. Although traditional clinical effectiveness and implementation trials are likely to remain the most common approach to moving a clinical intervention through from efficacy research to public health impact, judicious use of the proposed hybrid designs could speed the translation of research findings into routine practice.

Health Policy Implementation Science Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Behavioral and Psychological StudiesComputer science

MeSH terms

Health Services ResearchHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePublic HealthResearch DesignUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsTranslational Research, BiomedicalComparative Effectiveness Research

Citations

4,065

FWCI

91.39

field-weighted impact

References

Percentile

100%

vs. same field & year

Citations per year

Cited by

Three Problems With Current Digital Mental Health Research . . . and Three Things We Can Do About Them