Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Bayes or Bootstrap? A Simulation Study Comparing the Performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sampling and Bootstrapping in Assessing Phylogenetic Confidence

Molecular Biology and Evolution · 2003 · Vol. 20(2) · pp. 255–266
Michael E. Alfaro

Abstract

Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling has become increasingly popular in phylogenetics as a method for both estimating the maximum likelihood topology and for assessing nodal confidence. Despite the growing use of posterior probabilities, the relationship between the Bayesian measure of confidence and the most commonly used confidence measure in phylogenetics, the nonparametric bootstrap proportion, is poorly understood. We used computer simulation to investigate the behavior of three phylogenetic confidence methods: Bayesian posterior probabilities calculated via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling (BMCMC-PP), maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion (ML-BP), and maximum parsimony bootstrap proportion (MP-BP). We simulated the evolution of DNA sequence on 17-taxon topologies under 18 evolutionary scenarios and examined the performance of these methods in assigning confidence to correct monophyletic and incorrect monophyletic groups, and we examined the effects of increasing character number on support value. BMCMC-PP and ML-BP were often strongly correlated with one another but could provide substantially different estimates of support on short internodes. In contrast, BMCMC-PP correlated poorly with MP-BP across most of the simulation conditions that we examined. For a given threshold value, more correct monophyletic groups were supported by BMCMC-PP than by either ML-BP or MP-BP. When threshold values were chosen that fixed the rate of accepting incorrect monophyletic relationship as true at 5%, all three methods recovered most of the correct relationships on the simulated topologies, although BMCMC-PP and ML-BP performed better than MP-BP. BMCMC-PP was usually a less biased predictor of phylogenetic accuracy than either bootstrapping method. BMCMC-PP provided high support values for correct topological bipartitions with fewer characters than was needed for nonparametric bootstrap.

Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenetic diversity and population structureGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMarkov chain Monte CarloStatisticsMonophylyBootstrapping (finance)BiologyConfidence intervalBayesian probabilityBayes' theoremMonte Carlo methodMathematics

MeSH terms

Bayes TheoremMarkov ChainsModels, GeneticMonte Carlo MethodPhylogenyStatistics as Topic

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
Citations
1,124
FWCI
118.74
field-weighted impact
References
43
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Markov Chasin Monte Carlo Algorithms for the Bayesian Analysis of Phylogenetic Trees
Molecular Biology and Evolution · 1999 · 1,618 citations
Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife
The Annals of Statistics · 1979 · 17,226 citations
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees
Bioinformatics · 2001 · 22,042 citations
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny
Bioinformatics · 2001 · 4,905 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.