Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Is Technological Change In Medicine Worth It?

Health Affairs · 2001 · Vol. 20(5) · pp. 11–29
David CutlerMark McClellan

Abstract

Medical technology is valuable if the benefits of medical advances exceed the costs. We analyze technological change in five conditions to determine if this is so. In four of the conditions--heart attacks, low-birthweight infants, depression, and cataracts--the estimated benefit of technological change is much greater than the cost. In the fifth condition, breast cancer, costs and benefits are about of equal magnitude. We conclude that medical spending as a whole is worth the increased cost of care. This has many implications for public policy.

Healthcare Policy and ManagementGlobal Health Care IssuesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeTechnological changeMedical careMedical costsDepression (economics)Great DepressionCataractsHealth careEconomicsMedicineActuarial science

MeSH terms

Breast NeoplasmsCataract ExtractionCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressive DisorderHealth PolicyHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMyocardial InfarctionUnited StatesHealth Care CostsBiomedical Technology
Citations
879
FWCI
115.97
field-weighted impact
References
33
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The Aging Population and Its Impact on the Surgery Workforce
Annals of Surgery · 2003 · 877 citations
References
Medical Care Costs: How Much Welfare Loss?
The Journal of Economic Perspectives · 1992 · 1,209 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.