Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1

MIS Quarterly · 2006 · Vol. 30(3) · pp. 611–642
Gregor

Abstract

The aim of this research essay is to examine the structural nature of theory in Information Systems. Despite the importance of theory, questions relating to its form and structure are neglected in comparison with questions relating to epistemology. The essay addresses issues of causality, explanation, prediction, and generalization that underlie an understanding of theory. A taxonomy is proposed that classifies information systems theories with respect to the manner in which four central goals are addressed: analysis, explanation, prediction, and prescription. Five interrelated types of theory are distinguished: (1) theory for analyzing, (2) theory for explaining, (3) theory for predicting, (4) theory for explaining and predicting, and (5) theory for design and action. Examples illustrate the nature of each theory type. The applicability of the taxonomy is demonstrated by classifying a sample of journal articles. The paper contributes by showing that multiple views of theory exist and by exposing the assumptions underlying different viewpoints. In addition, it is suggested that the type of theory under development can influence the choice of an epistemological approach. Support is given for the legitimacy and value of each theory type. The building of integrated bodies of theory that encompass all theory types is advocated.

Citations
3,184
FWCI
267.10
field-weighted impact
References
106
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Action design research
MIS Quarterly · 2011 · 1,189 citations
Action Design Research1
MIS Quarterly · 2011 · 1,367 citations
Predictive Analytics in Information Systems Research1
MIS Quarterly · 2011 · 1,191 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.