Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities

Journal of Animal Ecology · 2004 · Vol. 73(3) · pp. 585–598
Eric L. BerlowA.M. NeutelJoel E. CohenPeter C. de RuiterBo EbenmanMark EmmersonJeremy W. FoxVincent A. A. JansenJ. Iwan JonesGiorgos D. KokkorisDmitrii O. LogofetAlan J. McKaneJosé M. MontoyaOwen L. Petchey

Abstract

Summary Recent efforts to understand how the patterning of interaction strength affects both structure and dynamics in food webs have highlighted several obstacles to productive synthesis. Issues arise with respect to goals and driving questions, methods and approaches, and placing results in the context of broader ecological theory. Much confusion stems from lack of clarity about whether the questions posed relate to community‐level patterns or to species dynamics, and to what authors actually mean by the term ‘interaction strength’. Here, we describe the various ways in which this term has been applied and discuss the implications of loose terminology and definition for the development of this field. Of particular concern is the clear gap between theoretical and empirical investigations of interaction strengths and food web dynamics. The ecological community urgently needs to explore new ways to estimate biologically reasonable model coefficients from empirical data, such as foraging rates, body size, metabolic rate, biomass distribution and other species traits. Combining numerical and analytical modelling approaches should allow exploration of the conditions under which different interaction strengths metrics are interchangeable with regard to relative magnitude, system responses, and species identity. Finally, the prime focus on predator–prey links in much of the research to date on interaction strengths in food webs has meant that the potential significance of non‐trophic interactions, such as competition, facilitation and biotic disturbance, has been largely ignored by the food web community. Such interactions may be important dynamically and should be routinely included in future food web research programmes.

Plant and animal studiesIsotope Analysis in EcologyEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationTerminologyCLARITYFood webEcologyContext (archaeology)ForagingTrophic levelCompetition (biology)Ecological systems theoryComputer science

Funding

  • European Science Foundation
Citations
791
FWCI
38.25
field-weighted impact
References
216
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Intertidal community structure
Oecologia · 1974 · 1,402 citations
A Note on Trophic Complexity and Community Stability
The American Naturalist · 1969 · 1,769 citations
Biodiversity: Population Versus Ecosystem Stability
Ecology · 1996 · 1,630 citations
Continuous Univariate Distributions.
Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1995 · 9,247 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.