Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998

The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2003 · Vol. 118(1) · pp. 1–41
Thomas PikettyEmmanuel Saez

Abstract

This paper presents new homogeneous series on top shares of income and wages from 1913 to 1998 in the United States using individual tax returns data. Top income and wages shares display a U-shaped pattern over the century. Our series suggest that the large shocks that capital owners experienced during the Great Depression and World War II have had a permanent effect on top capital incomes. We argue that steep progressive income and estate taxation may have prevented large fortunes from fully recovering from these shocks. Top wage shares were flat before World War II, dropped precipitously during the war, and did not start to recover before the late 1960s but are now higher than before World War II. As a result, the working rich have replaced the rentiers at the top of the income distribution.

Citations
3,771
FWCI
181.47
field-weighted impact
References
52
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?<sup>*</sup>
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2008 · 1,809 citations
Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists
The Review of Economics and Statistics · 2008 · 2,379 citations
References
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 1992 · 4,499 citations
American Economic Review
American Economic Review · 2009 · 4,745 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.