Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Screening for prostate cancer

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Vol. 2013(1) · pp. CD004720–CD004720
Dragan IlićMolly M. NeubergerMia DjulbegovicPhilipp Dahm

Abstract

Prostate cancer screening did not significantly decrease prostate cancer-specific mortality in a combined meta-analysis of five RCTs. Only one study (ERSPC) reported a 21% significant reduction of prostate cancer-specific mortality in a pre-specified subgroup of men aged 55 to 69 years. Pooled data currently demonstrates no significant reduction in prostate cancer-specific and overall mortality. Harms associated with PSA-based screening and subsequent diagnostic evaluations are frequent, and moderate in severity. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment are common and are associated with treatment-related harms. Men should be informed of this and the demonstrated adverse effects when they are deciding whether or not to undertake screening for prostate cancer. Any reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality may take up to 10 years to accrue; therefore, men who have a life expectancy less than 10 to 15 years should be informed that screening for prostate cancer is unlikely to be beneficial. No studies examined the independent role of screening by DRE.

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningMedicineProstate cancerMeta-analysisRectal examinationProstate cancer screeningMEDLINERandomized controlled trialProstate-specific antigenCochrane LibraryClinical trial

MeSH terms

HumansMaleAgedAged, 80 and overMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicProstate-Specific AntigenBiopsy, Fine-NeedleDigital Rectal ExaminationEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Citations
1,144
FWCI
112.55
field-weighted impact
References
294
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.