Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Tropospheric Aerosol Optical Thickness from the GOCART Model and Comparisons with Satellite and Sun Photometer Measurements

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · 2002 · Vol. 59(3) · pp. 461–483
Mian ChinPaul GinouxStefan KinneOmar TorresB. N. HolbenB. N. DuncanRandall V. MartinJennifer A. LoganAkiko HigurashiTeruyuki Nakajima

Abstract

The Georgia Institute of Technology–Goddard Global Ozone Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GOCART) model is used to simulate the aerosol optical thickness τ for major types of tropospheric aerosols including sulfate, dust, organic carbon (OC), black carbon (BC), and sea salt. The GOCART model uses a dust emission algorithm that quantifies the dust source as a function of the degree of topographic depression, and a biomass burning emission source that includes seasonal and interannual variability based on satellite observations. Results presented here show that on global average, dust aerosol has the highest τ at 500 nm (0.051), followed by sulfate (0.040), sea salt (0.027), OC (0.017), and BC (0.007). There are large geographical and seasonal variations of τ, controlled mainly by emission, transport, and hygroscopic properties of aerosols. The model calculated total τs at 500 nm have been compared with the satellite retrieval products from the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) over both land and ocean and from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) over the ocean. The model reproduces most of the prominent features in the satellite data, with an overall agreement within a factor of 2 over the aerosol source areas and outflow regions. While there are clear differences among the satellite products, a major discrepancy between the model and the satellite data is that the model shows a stronger variation of τ from source to remote regions. Quantitative comparison of model and satellite data is still difficult, due to the large uncertainties involved in deriving the τ values by both the model and satellite retrieval, and by the inconsistency in physical and optical parameters used between the model and the satellite retrieval. The comparison of monthly averaged model results with the sun photometer network [Aerosol Robotics Network (AERONET)] measurements shows that the model reproduces the seasonal variations at most of the sites, especially the places where biomass burning or dust aerosol dominates.

Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateAerosolTotal Ozone Mapping SpectrometerEnvironmental scienceSatelliteSea saltAtmospheric sciencesTroposphereRadiometerOzone Monitoring InstrumentClimatology

Funding

  • National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
Citations
1,696
FWCI
27.27
field-weighted impact
References
59
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
An emerging ground‐based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2001 · 2,325 citations
A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 1995 · 4,590 citations
Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2001 · 2,356 citations
Multidimensional Flux-Form Semi-Lagrangian Transport Schemes
Monthly Weather Review · 1996 · 1,271 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.