Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance

Organization Science · 2009 · Vol. 20(4) · pp. 685–695
Sebastian RaischJulian BirkinshawGilbert ProbstMichael L. Tushman

Abstract

Organizational ambidexterity has emerged as a new research paradigm in organization theory, yet several issues fundamental to this debate remain controversial. We explore four central tensions here: Should organizations achieve ambidexterity through differentiation or through integration? Does ambidexterity occur at the individual or organizational level? Must organizations take a static or dynamic perspective on ambidexterity? Finally, can ambidexterity arise internally, or do firms have to externalize some processes? We provide an overview of the seven articles included in this special issue and suggest several avenues for future research.

Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and InnovationComplex Systems and Decision MakingAmbidexterityKnowledge managementPerspective (graphical)BusinessIndustrial organizationComputer scienceArtificial intelligence
Citations
2,161
FWCI
199.04
field-weighted impact
References
95
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge
Organization Science · 2011 · 1,753 citations
References
Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm
Administrative Science Quarterly · 1997 · 2,868 citations
The myopia of learning
Strategic Management Journal · 1993 · 7,125 citations
Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance
Organization Science · 1992 · 1,841 citations
Dynamic capabilities: what are they?
Strategic Management Journal · 2000 · 14,245 citations
The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation
Academy of Management Journal · 2006 · 3,116 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.