Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Recommended implementation of arterial spin‐labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2014 · Vol. 73(1) · pp. 102–116
David C. AlsopJohn A. DetreXavier GolayMatthias GüntherJeroen HendrikseLuis Hernández-GarcíaHanzhang LuBradley J. MacIntoshLaura M. ParkesMarion SmitsMatthias J.P. van OschDanny J.J. WangEric C. WongGreg Zaharchuk

Abstract

This review provides a summary statement of recommended implementations of arterial spin labeling (ASL) for clinical applications. It is a consensus of the ISMRM Perfusion Study Group and the European ASL in Dementia consortium, both of whom met to reach this consensus in October 2012 in Amsterdam. Although ASL continues to undergo rapid technical development, we believe that current ASL methods are robust and ready to provide useful clinical information, and that a consensus statement on recommended implementations will help the clinical community to adopt a standardized approach. In this review, we describe the major considerations and trade-offs in implementing an ASL protocol and provide specific recommendations for a standard approach. Our conclusion is that as an optimal default implementation, we recommend pseudo-continuous labeling, background suppression, a segmented three-dimensional readout without vascular crushing gradients, and calculation and presentation of both label/control difference images and cerebral blood flow in absolute units using a simplified model.

Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesMRI in cancer diagnosisArterial spin labelingMedicineCerebral blood flowProtocol (science)PerfusionImplementationStatement (logic)Cerebral perfusion pressureMedical physicsComputer science

MeSH terms

Blood Flow VelocityBrainCerebrovascular CirculationDementiaEuropean UnionHumansNeurologySpin LabelsPractice Guidelines as TopicMagnetic Resonance Angiography

Funding

  • European Commission
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Citations
2,176
FWCI
108.40
field-weighted impact
References
74
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.