Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation

International Journal of Epidemiology · 2008 · Vol. 37(5) · pp. 1148–1157
Nikolaos A. PatsopoulosΕvangelos ΕvangelouJohn P. A. Ioannidis

Abstract

The proposed algorithms can be routinely applied in meta-analyses as standardized sensitivity analyses for heterogeneity. Caution is needed evaluating post hoc which specific studies are responsible for the heterogeneity.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics researchStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysisStatisticsStudy heterogeneitySensitivity (control systems)MathematicsSystematic reviewMedicineGenetic heterogeneityAlgorithmMEDLINE

MeSH terms

AlgorithmsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicModels, StatisticalTreatment OutcomeDatabases, Genetic
Citations
1,125
FWCI
11.31
field-weighted impact
References
32
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression
Statistics in Medicine · 2004 · 1,233 citations
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
BMJ · 2003 · 61,700 citations
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Statistics in Medicine · 2002 · 36,106 citations
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · 11,357 citations
The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments
Biometrics · 1954 · 5,313 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.