Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Microarray based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH) detects submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and duplications in patients with learning disability/mental retardation and dysmorphic features

Journal of Medical Genetics · 2004 · Vol. 41(4) · pp. 241–248
C Shaw-SmithR RedonL RickmanM RioL WillattH FieglerH FirthD SanlavilleR WinterL ColleauxM BobrowN P Carter

Abstract

The underlying causes of learning disability and dysmorphic features in many patients remain unidentified despite extensive investigation. Routine karyotype analysis is not sensitive enough to detect subtle chromosome rearrangements (less than 5 Mb). The presence of subtle DNA copy number changes was investigated by array-CGH in 50 patients with learning disability and dysmorphism, employing a DNA microarray constructed from large insert clones spaced at approximately 1 Mb intervals across the genome. Twelve copy number abnormalities were identified in 12 patients (24% of the total): seven deletions (six apparently de novo and one inherited from a phenotypically normal parent) and five duplications (one de novo and four inherited from phenotypically normal parents). Altered segments ranged in size from those involving a single clone to regions as large as 14 Mb. No recurrent deletion or duplication was identified within this cohort of patients. On the basis of these results, we anticipate that array-CGH will become a routine method of genome-wide screening for imbalanced rearrangements in children with learning disability.

Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGene duplicationCopy-number variationGeneticsBiologyKaryotypeSegmental duplicationGenomeMicroarrayChromosomeComparative genomic hybridization

MeSH terms

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChromosome AberrationsChromosome DeletionFemaleHumansLearning DisabilitiesMaleIntellectual DisabilityOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisCytogenetic AnalysisChromosome Disorders

Funding

  • Wellcome Trust
Citations
508
FWCI
34.45
field-weighted impact
References
35
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.