Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

North American Regional Reanalysis

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2006 · Vol. 87(3) · pp. 343–360
Fedor MesingerGeoff DiMegoEugenia KalnayKenneth E. MitchellP. ShafranWesley EbisuzakiDušan JovićJack WoollenEric RogersErnesto Hugo BerberyMichael EkYun FanRobert GrumbineW. HigginsHong LiYing LinGeoff ManikinDavid ParrishWei Shi

Abstract

In 1997, during the late stages of production of NCEP–NCAR Global Reanalysis (GR), exploration of a regional reanalysis project was suggested by the GR project's Advisory Committee, “particularly if the RDAS [Regional Data Assimilation System] is significantly better than the global reanalysis at capturing the regional hydrological cycle, the diurnal cycle and other important features of weather and climate variability.” Following a 6-yr development and production effort, NCEP's North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) project was completed in 2004, and data are now available to the scientific community. Along with the use of the NCEP Eta model and its Data Assimilation System (at 32-km–45-layer resolution with 3-hourly output), the hallmarks of the NARR are the incorporation of hourly assimilation of precipitation, which leverages a comprehensive precipitation analysis effort, the use of a recent version of the Noah land surface model, and the use of numerous other datasets that are additional or improved compared to the GR. Following the practice applied to NCEP's GR, the 25-yr NARR retrospective production period (1979–2003) is augmented by the construction and daily execution of a system for near-real-time continuation of the NARR, known as the Regional Climate Data Assimilation System (R-CDAS). Highlights of the NARR results are presented: precipitation over the continental United States (CONUS), which is seen to be very near the ingested analyzed precipitation; fits of tropospheric temperatures and winds to rawinsonde observations; and fits of 2-m temperatures and 10-m winds to surface station observations. The aforementioned fits are compared to those of the NCEP–Department of Energy (DOE) Global Reanalysis (GR2). Not only have the expectations cited above been fully met, but very substantial improvements in the accuracy of temperatures and winds compared to that of GR2 are achieved throughout the troposphere. Finally, the numerous datasets produced are outlined and information is provided on the data archiving and present data availability.

Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsClimatologyData assimilationRadiosondeEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationClimate Forecast SystemClimate modelDiurnal cycleMeteorologyClimate change
Citations
3,497
FWCI
69.20
field-weighted impact
References
30
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2)
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2002 · 5,394 citations
The NCEP–NCAR 50–Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD–ROM and Documentation
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2001 · 4,335 citations
The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 1996 · 29,024 citations
An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for Climate
Journal of Climate · 2002 · 4,641 citations
NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2)
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2002 · 762 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.