articleTop 1% cited

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · Vol. 64(12) · pp. 1294–1302

Gordon Guyatt✉(McMaster University)Andrew D Oxman(Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten)Regina Kunz(University Hospital of Basel)James Woodcock(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)Jan Brożek(McMaster University)Mark Helfand(Oregon Health & Science University)Pablo Alonso‐Coello(Hospital de Sant Pau)Paul Glasziou(Bond University)Roman Jaeschke(McMaster University)Elie A. Akl(University at Buffalo, State University of New York)Susan L. Norris(Oregon Health & Science University)Gunn Elisabeth Vist(Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten)Philipp Dahm(University of Florida)Vijay K. Shukla(Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health)Julian P. T. Higgins(MRC Biostatistics Unit)Yngve Falck–Ytter(Case Western Reserve University)Holger J. Schünemann(McMaster University)

View via DOI Publisher page

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Climate Change and Health ImpactsSpurious relationshipEconometricsCredibilityStatisticsQuality (philosophy)Statistical hypothesis testingConsistency (knowledge bases)Omnibus testPoint estimationPublication bias

MeSH terms

HumansResearch DesignObserver VariationConfidence IntervalsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicSample SizeEvidence-Based Medicine

Citations

2,330

FWCI

57.67

field-weighted impact

References

Percentile

100%

vs. same field & year

Citations per year

Cited by

Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder