Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts

Systematic Biology · 1992 · Vol. 41(1) · pp. 18–32
Theodore GarlandPaul HarveyAnthony R. Ives

Abstract

We discuss and clarify several aspects of applying Felsenstein's (1985, Am. Nat. 125: 1–15) procedures to test for correlated evolution of continuous traits. This is one of several available comparative methods that maps data for phenotypic traits onto an existing phylogenetic tree (derived from independent information). Application of Felsenstein's method does not require an entirely dichotomous topology. It also does not require an assumption of gradual, clocklike character evolution, as might be modeled by Brownian motion. Almost any available information can be used to estimate branch lengths (e.g., genetic distances, divergence times estimated from the fossil record or from molecular clocks, numbers of character changes from a cladistic analysis). However, the adequacy for statistical purposes of any proposed branch lengths must be verified empirically for each phytogeny and for each character. We suggest a simple way of doing this, based on graphical analysis of plots of standardized independent contrasts versus their standard deviations (i.e., the square roots of the sums of their branch lengths). In some cases, the branch lengths and/or the values of traits being studied will require transformation. An example involving the scaling of mammalian home range area is presented. Once adequately standardized, sets of independent contrasts can be analyzed using either linear or nonlinear (multiple) regression. In all cases, however, regressions (or correlations) must be computed through the origin. We also discuss ways of correcting for body size effects and how this relates to making graphical representations of relationships of standardized independent contrasts. We close with a consideration of the types of traits that can be analyzed with independent contrasts procedures and conclude that any (continuous) trait that is inherited from ancestors is appropriate for analysis, regardless of the mechanism of inheritance (e.g., genetic or cultural).

Evolution and Paleontology StudiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetryDivergence (linguistics)Range (aeronautics)Character (mathematics)Phylogenetic treeStatisticsPhylogenetic comparative methodsBiologyMathematicsRegressionScaling

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
Citations
2,207
FWCI
50.37
field-weighted impact
References
24
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation
Systematic Biology · 1993 · 1,241 citations
Why tropical forest lizards are vulnerable to climate warming
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2009 · 945 citations
A method for the analysis of comparative data
Journal of Theoretical Biology · 1992 · 684 citations
Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate
Systematic Biology · 2008 · 919 citations
Predicting extinction risk in declining species
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2000 · 1,736 citations
Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology
Journal of Experimental Biology · 2005 · 699 citations
References
A method for the analysis of comparative data
Journal of Theoretical Biology · 1992 · 684 citations
Applied Linear Regression Models
Technometrics · 1997 · 4,668 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.