Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Monitoring, reporting and verification for national REDD + programmes: two proposals

Environmental Research Letters · 2011 · Vol. 6(1) · pp. 014002–014002
Martin HeroldMargaret Skutsch

Abstract

Different options have been suggested by Parties to the UNFCCC (United Framework Convention on Climate Change) for inclusion in national approaches to REDD and REDD + (reduced deforestation, reduced degradation, enhancement of forest carbon stocks, sustainable management of forest, and conservation of forest carbon stocks). This paper proposes that from the practical and technical points of view of designing action for REDD and REDD + at local and sub-national level, as well as from the point of view of the necessary MRV (monitoring, reporting and verification), these should be grouped into three categories: conservation, which is rewarded on the basis of no changes in forest stock, reduced deforestation, in which lowered rates of forest area loss are rewarded, and positive impacts on carbon stock changes in forests remaining forest, which includes reduced degradation, sustainable management of forest of various kinds, and forest enhancement. Thus we have moved degradation, which conventionally is grouped with deforestation, into the forest management group reported as areas remaining forest land, with which it has, in reality, and particularly as regards MRV, much more in common. Secondly, in the context of the fact that REDD/REDD + is to take the form of a national or near-national approach, we argue that while systematic national monitoring is important, it may not be necessary for REDD/REDD + activities, or for national MRV, to be started at equal levels of intensity all over the country. Rather, areas where interventions seem easiest to start may be targeted, and here data measurements may be more rigorous (Tier 3), for example based on stakeholder self-monitoring with independent verification, while in other, untreated areas, a lower level of monitoring may be pursued, at least in the first instance. Treated areas may be targeted for any of the three groups of activities (conservation, reduced deforestation, and positive impact on carbon stock increases in forest remaining forest).

Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and PolicyLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesReducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradationDeforestation (computer science)Forest managementCarbon stockSustainable forest managementEnvironmental resource managementBusinessContext (archaeology)United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeStock (firearms)

Funding

  • Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid
Citations
544
FWCI
43.97
field-weighted impact
References
33
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Monitoring, reporting and verification for national REDD + programmes: two proposals · Scinovex