article Open AccessTop 1% cited
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2009 · Vol. 62(10) · pp. 1013–1020
Beverley Shea✉(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc)Candyce Hamel(Institute of Population and Public Health)George A. Wells(University of Ottawa)L.M. BouterElizabeth Kristjansson(University of Ottawa)Jeremy Grimshaw(University of Ottawa)David Henry(Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)Maarten Boers(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc)
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchReliability and Agreement in MeasurementIntraclass correlationInter-rater reliabilityKappaMedicineConstruct validityReliability (semiconductor)Systematic reviewConfidence intervalCriterion validityCohen's kappa
MeSH terms
Feasibility StudiesHumansQuality ControlResearch DesignReview Literature as TopicReproducibility of ResultsObserver VariationEvidence-Based Medicine
Citations
1,750
FWCI
34.04
field-weighted impact
References
52
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
BMJ Open · 2017 · 705 citations
Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2017 · 3,125 citations
Childhood obesity and adult cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review with meta-analysis
BMC Public Health · 2017 · 511 citations
The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Human Reproduction · 2016 · 1,414 citations
Measuring GFR: A Systematic Review
American Journal of Kidney Diseases · 2014 · 482 citations
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
BMJ · 2017 · 9,993 citations
Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews
Environmental Research · 2017 · 924 citations
References
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
The Lancet · 1986 · 47,160 citations
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
BMJ · 2001 · 3,343 citations
Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.
Psychological Bulletin · 1968 · 8,425 citations
Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2002 · 1,371 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.