Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty

Cognition · 1996 · Vol. 58(1) · pp. 1–73
Leda Cosmides
Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFrequentist inferenceOverconfidence effectHeuristicsProbabilistic logicPsychologyPerspective (graphical)FallacyEpistemologyCognitive psychologyConfirmation bias
Citations
1,294
FWCI
24.61
field-weighted impact
References
82
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Annual Review of Psychology · 2007 · 4,969 citations
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Academy of Management Review · 2004 · 3,601 citations
In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning
Trends in Cognitive Sciences · 2003 · 2,208 citations
Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing
The Journal of Finance · 2001 · 2,421 citations
A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.
American Psychologist · 2003 · 5,435 citations
Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences
Academic Medicine · 1998 · 505 citations
Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics
American Economic Review · 2003 · 5,292 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty · Scinovex