Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop.

Environmental Health Perspectives · 1996 · Vol. 104(suppl 4) · pp. 715–740
Robert J. KavlockG. P. DastonClaudio De RosaPenelope A. Fenner-CrispL. Earl GrayS. L. KaattariGeorge W. LucierM I LusterMichael J. MacCarol MaczkaRonald G. MillerJohn MooreRosalind M. RollandGeoffrey I. ScottDaniel M. SheehanT SinksH.A. Tilson

Abstract

The hypothesis has been put forward that humans and wildlife species adverse suffered adverse health effects after exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Reported adverse effects include declines in populations, increases in cancers, and reduced reproductive function. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sponsored a workshop in April 1995 to bring together interested parties in an effort to identify research gaps related to this hypothesis and to establish priorities for future research activities. Approximately 90 invited participants were organized into work groups developed around the principal reported health effects-carcinogenesis, reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, and immunotoxicity-as well as along the risk assessment paradigm-hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. Attention focused on both ecological and human health effects. In general, group felt that the hypothesis warranted a concerted research effort to evaluate its validity and that research should focus primarily on effects on development of reproductive capability, on improved exposure assessment, and on the effects of mixtures. This report summarizes the discussions of the work groups and details the recommendations for additional research.

Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentRisk assessmentEnvironmental healthExposure assessmentEnvironmental epidemiologyAgency (philosophy)Adverse effectMedicineHealth risk assessmentReproductive healthHuman health

MeSH terms

AnimalsEducationEndocrine GlandsEnvironmentEnvironmental PollutantsHealthHumansResearchUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyRisk Assessment

Funding

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • Emory University
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of Missouri
  • Harvard University
  • Tulane University
  • McGill University
  • York University
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
  • Turun Yliopisto
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Council for Research in the Social Sciences, Columbia University
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • National Marine Fisheries Service
  • Northwest Fisheries Science Center
Citations
1,124
FWCI
38.72
field-weighted impact
References
169
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.