Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

A review of the direct and indirect effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on vertebrate wildlife

Environmental Science and Pollution Research · 2014 · Vol. 22(1) · pp. 103–118
David W. GibbonsChristy A. MorrisseyPierre Mineau

Abstract

Concerns over the role of pesticides affecting vertebrate wildlife populations have recently focussed on systemic products which exert broad-spectrum toxicity. Given that the neonicotinoids have become the fastest-growing class of insecticides globally, we review here 150 studies of their direct (toxic) and indirect (e.g. food chain) effects on vertebrate wildlife--mammals, birds, fish, amphibians and reptiles. We focus on two neonicotinoids, imidacloprid and clothianidin, and a third insecticide, fipronil, which also acts in the same systemic manner. Imidacloprid and fipronil were found to be toxic to many birds and most fish, respectively. All three insecticides exert sub-lethal effects, ranging from genotoxic and cytotoxic effects, and impaired immune function, to reduced growth and reproductive success, often at concentrations well below those associated with mortality. Use of imidacloprid and clothianidin as seed treatments on some crops poses risks to small birds, and ingestion of even a few treated seeds could cause mortality or reproductive impairment to sensitive bird species. In contrast, environmental concentrations of imidacloprid and clothianidin appear to be at levels below those which will cause mortality to freshwater vertebrates, although sub-lethal effects may occur. Some recorded environmental concentrations of fipronil, however, may be sufficiently high to harm fish. Indirect effects are rarely considered in risk assessment processes and there is a paucity of data, despite the potential to exert population-level effects. Our research revealed two field case studies of indirect effects. In one, reductions in invertebrate prey from both imidacloprid and fipronil uses led to impaired growth in a fish species, and in another, reductions in populations in two lizard species were linked to effects of fipronil on termite prey. Evidence presented here suggests that the systemic insecticides, neonicotinoids and fipronil, are capable of exerting direct and indirect effects on terrestrial and aquatic vertebrate wildlife, thus warranting further review of their environmental safety.

Insect and Pesticide ResearchInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlImidaclopridClothianidinFipronilBiologyWildlifeToxicologyPesticideNeonicotinoidEcotoxicologyZoology

MeSH terms

NeonicotinoidsAnimalsEnvironmental PollutantsImidazolesInsecticidesNitro CompoundsPyrazolesReproductionRisk AssessmentNicotinic AgonistsFood Chain

Funding

  • Universiteit Utrecht
  • Adessium Foundation
Citations
729
FWCI
43.62
field-weighted impact
References
122
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil
Environmental Science and Pollution Research · 2014 · 1,302 citations
The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
Environmental Science and Pollution Research · 2017 · 577 citations
Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites
Environmental Science and Pollution Research · 2014 · 1,731 citations
Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services
Environmental Science and Pollution Research · 2014 · 549 citations
References
Overview of the Status and Global Strategy for Neonicotinoids
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2010 · 1,818 citations
Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2001 · 1,961 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.