Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Metrics to ‘green’ chemistry—which are the best?

Green Chemistry · 2002 · Vol. 4(6) · pp. 521–527
David J. C. ConstableAlan D. CurzonsVirginia Cunningham

Abstract

A considerable amount has been written about the use of metrics to drive business, government and communities towards more sustainable practices. A number of metrics have also been proposed over the past 5–10 years to make chemists aware of the need to change the methods used for chemical syntheses and chemical processes. This paper explores several metrics commonly used by chemists and compares and contrasts these metrics with a new metric known as reaction mass efficiency. The paper also uses an economic analysis of four commercial pharmaceutical processes to understand the relationship between metrics and the most important cost drivers in these processes.

Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringProcess Optimization and IntegrationMetric (unit)Government (linguistics)Computer scienceBiochemical engineeringManagement scienceEngineeringOperations management
Citations
872
FWCI
6.10
field-weighted impact
References
4
Percentile
96%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Metrics of Green Chemistry and Sustainability: Past, Present, and Future
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2017 · 1,161 citations
The E Factor: fifteen years on
Green Chemistry · 2007 · 1,597 citations
E factors, green chemistry and catalysis: an odyssey
Chemical Communications · 2008 · 867 citations
Analysis of the reactions used for the preparation of drug candidate molecules
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry · 2006 · 1,866 citations
Green Chemistry: Principles and Practice
Chemical Society Reviews · 2009 · 4,880 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.