article Open AccessTop 1% cited

A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score

European Urology · 2015 · Vol. 69(3) · pp. 428–435

Jonathan I. Epstein✉(Johns Hopkins University)Michael J. Zeléfsky(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)Daniel D. Sjoberg(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)Joel B. Nelson(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)Lars Egevad(Karolinska Institutet)Cristina Magi‐Galluzzi(Cleveland Clinic)Andrew J. Vickers(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)Anil V. Parwani(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)Victor E. Reuter(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)Samson W. Fine(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)James A. Eastham(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)Peter Wiklund(Karolinska Institutet)Misop Han(Johns Hopkins University)C.A. Reddy(Cleveland Clinic)Jay P. Ciezki(Cleveland Clinic)Tommy Nyberg(Karolinska Institutet)Eric A. Klein(Cleveland Clinic)

View via DOI Publisher page

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchMedicineProstatectomyProstate cancerCohortBiochemical recurrenceRadiation therapyGrading (engineering)Hazard ratioProportional hazards modelProstate

MeSH terms

AgedDecision Support TechniquesHumansKallikreinsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapySwedenTime FactorsUnited StatesReproducibility of ResultsMultivariate Analysis

Citations

1,346

FWCI

105.95

field-weighted impact

References

Percentile

100%

vs. same field & year

Citations per year

Cited by

The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs—Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours